Active Users:708 Time:31/10/2026 02:29:02 AM
Re: Crap RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM
I am a lowly grunt-turned-electrical engineer and I like to think I would score better on an IQ test than the more than average theologian. Is some of that conceit? Maybe. But, I think your typical theologian is a charlatan.


And I would agree with you.

I've been in too many discussions or debates with philosophers that hinge on their manipulation of logic and sophistry to be convinced that their intelligence is that impressive.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 2033 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 1073 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 403 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 1065 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 876 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 916 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 790 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 891 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 839 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 790 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 778 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 738 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 708 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 847 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 788 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 907 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 735 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 721 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 833 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 847 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 869 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 815 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 772 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 764 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 743 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1281 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 792 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 773 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 792 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 730 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 814 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 776 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 707 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 718 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 723 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 1128 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 693 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 745 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 727 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 337 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 322 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 814 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 941 Views

Reply to Message