Active Users:343 Time:17/06/2025 11:49:56 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory car'a'aman Send a noteboard - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
The theory merely states that the wheel is infinite.
If it is infinite and will turn for infinity in the future, that means, the DO will break free.
But if it has already turned infinitely in the past, and the DO has never broken free, then there is no chance of him ever breaking free. So your line of thought never helps the theory, indeed I am sure its not what the writer meant by "1c. the wheel is infinite". He probably made a mistake in his logic when stating an infinite past.

Regardless, your point is still invalid as I mentioned above. An infinite past where the DO has had infinite tries to break free is still possible as an independent idea.
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
This message last edited by car'a'aman on 11/03/2010 at 08:16:34 AM
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature Sidious - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1786 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature Watcher - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 807 Views
Sisyphus *NM* damookster - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 274 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... Shannow - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 823 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees. Cannoli - 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM 894 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... Shishka - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 653 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil Sidious - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 677 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? Shannow - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 573 Views
Maybe Sidious - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 643 Views
Crap File Leader - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 634 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are... Shannow - 02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM 589 Views
I think the averages are averages. Kieran - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 561 Views
Re: Crap RugbyPlayingAshaman - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 531 Views
Re: Crap mogi67 - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 501 Views
I love IQ tests. Fanatic-Templar - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 499 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil Shishka - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 599 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil Sidious - 02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM 594 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil mogi67 - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 539 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... Shishka - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 689 Views
I doubt that. Fanatic-Templar - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 512 Views
Re: I doubt that. car'a'aman - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 500 Views
Yep, I agree. Shishka - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 596 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. Kieran - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 580 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... BlackAdder - 02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM 561 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature newyorkersedai - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 628 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature car'a'aman - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 577 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature newyorkersedai - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 552 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing car'a'aman - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 520 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and newyorkersedai - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 497 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland car'a'aman - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 950 Views
Nice Sidious - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 565 Views
Impressive newyorkersedai - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 560 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... Fanatic-Templar - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 560 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... car'a'aman - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 506 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. Fanatic-Templar - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 530 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. car'a'aman - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 519 Views
Because there is a Creator. Fanatic-Templar - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 483 Views
faulty assumptions car'a'aman - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 491 Views
Impossible. Fanatic-Templar - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 482 Views
maybe an analogy will help car'a'aman - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 900 Views
But therein lies the problem. Fanatic-Templar - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 480 Views
your own argument is self defeating car'a'aman - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 509 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned. Fanatic-Templar - 11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM 515 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM* car'a'aman - 12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM 232 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory car'a'aman - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 490 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 225 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* car'a'aman - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 216 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature RugbyPlayingAshaman - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 572 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... Napoleon62 - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 644 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes