Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
car'a'aman Send a noteboard - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
The theory merely states that the wheel is infinite.
If it is infinite and will turn for infinity in the future, that means, the DO will break free.
But if it has already turned infinitely in the past, and the DO has never broken free, then there is no chance of him ever breaking free. So your line of thought never helps the theory, indeed I am sure its not what the writer meant by "1c. the wheel is infinite". He probably made a mistake in his logic when stating an infinite past.
Regardless, your point is still invalid as I mentioned above. An infinite past where the DO has had infinite tries to break free is still possible as an independent idea.
If it is infinite and will turn for infinity in the future, that means, the DO will break free.
But if it has already turned infinitely in the past, and the DO has never broken free, then there is no chance of him ever breaking free. So your line of thought never helps the theory, indeed I am sure its not what the writer meant by "1c. the wheel is infinite". He probably made a mistake in his logic when stating an infinite past.
Regardless, your point is still invalid as I mentioned above. An infinite past where the DO has had infinite tries to break free is still possible as an independent idea.
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
This message last edited by car'a'aman on 11/03/2010 at 08:16:34 AM
Ishamael's nature
- 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
1877 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
919 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
- 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
998 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
- 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
730 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
768 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
- 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
661 Views
Crap
- 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
705 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
- 02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
678 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
698 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
684 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
624 Views
I doubt that.
- 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
596 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
640 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
707 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
674 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
632 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
- 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
1093 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
642 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
595 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
635 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
629 Views
Because there is a Creator.
- 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
574 Views
faulty assumptions
- 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
578 Views
Impossible.
- 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
585 Views
maybe an analogy will help
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
985 Views
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
985 Views
But therein lies the problem.
- 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
558 Views
your own argument is self defeating
- 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
593 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
- 11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
604 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
- 12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
265 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
- 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
562 Views
