Active Users:706 Time:31/10/2026 02:28:38 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory car'a'aman Send a noteboard - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
The theory merely states that the wheel is infinite.
If it is infinite and will turn for infinity in the future, that means, the DO will break free.
But if it has already turned infinitely in the past, and the DO has never broken free, then there is no chance of him ever breaking free. So your line of thought never helps the theory, indeed I am sure its not what the writer meant by "1c. the wheel is infinite". He probably made a mistake in his logic when stating an infinite past.

Regardless, your point is still invalid as I mentioned above. An infinite past where the DO has had infinite tries to break free is still possible as an independent idea.
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
This message last edited by car'a'aman on 11/03/2010 at 08:16:34 AM
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature Sidious - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 2033 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature Watcher - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 1072 Views
Sisyphus *NM* damookster - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 403 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... Shannow - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 1065 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees. Cannoli - 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM 1132 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... Shishka - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 876 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil Sidious - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 915 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? Shannow - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 790 Views
Maybe Sidious - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 891 Views
Crap File Leader - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 839 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are... Shannow - 02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM 820 Views
I think the averages are averages. Kieran - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 789 Views
Re: Crap RugbyPlayingAshaman - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 777 Views
Re: Crap mogi67 - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 737 Views
I love IQ tests. Fanatic-Templar - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 707 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil Shishka - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 847 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil Sidious - 02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM 854 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil mogi67 - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 788 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... Shishka - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 907 Views
I doubt that. Fanatic-Templar - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 735 Views
Re: I doubt that. car'a'aman - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 720 Views
Yep, I agree. Shishka - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 833 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. Kieran - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 846 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... BlackAdder - 02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM 791 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature newyorkersedai - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 869 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature car'a'aman - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 814 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature newyorkersedai - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 772 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing car'a'aman - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 764 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and newyorkersedai - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 742 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland car'a'aman - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1281 Views
Nice Sidious - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 792 Views
Impressive newyorkersedai - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 773 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... Fanatic-Templar - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 792 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... car'a'aman - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 729 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. Fanatic-Templar - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 813 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. car'a'aman - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 775 Views
Because there is a Creator. Fanatic-Templar - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 707 Views
faulty assumptions car'a'aman - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 718 Views
Impossible. Fanatic-Templar - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 723 Views
maybe an analogy will help car'a'aman - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 1127 Views
But therein lies the problem. Fanatic-Templar - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 693 Views
your own argument is self defeating car'a'aman - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 745 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned. Fanatic-Templar - 11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM 765 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM* car'a'aman - 12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM 350 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory car'a'aman - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 727 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 337 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* car'a'aman - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 322 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature RugbyPlayingAshaman - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 813 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... Napoleon62 - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 941 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes