Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
Artsapat Send a noteboard - 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
We got half of a book when he published A Feast for Crows. He gutted half of the plotlines and saved the rest for a second book that is now taking the name of what was supposed to be the last book in the series. The book that was originally going to be A Dance With Dragons is now one or more books with no title as of yet.
A Feast for Crows was a disappointing book because some of peoples' favorite characters just weren't in it. In fact, it's safe to say that the LEAST popular characters were all bunched into A Feast for Crows, while the most popular are all, so he says, in A Dance With Dragons. Now granted, he's taken this long with a book that was supposedly structurally done back when A Feast for Crows came out.
I understand that he's under no obligation, blah, blah, blah, but he has managed to really piss a lot of people off with the way he's handled things, plus the way that he lets people know he goes off to conventions and writes other books, all while his next book languishes.
I'm sure Tor is bitching him out, but unless HBO makes it a condition that he finishes the series in a set time frame in order to pick up the pilot for Ice and Fire, he may just drag the series out for another ten years (or more).
After all, I've been reading Robert Jordan since 1993. 16 years later and I'm waiting for the antepenultimate book in the series and the writer is dead.
A Feast for Crows was a disappointing book because some of peoples' favorite characters just weren't in it. In fact, it's safe to say that the LEAST popular characters were all bunched into A Feast for Crows, while the most popular are all, so he says, in A Dance With Dragons. Now granted, he's taken this long with a book that was supposedly structurally done back when A Feast for Crows came out.
I understand that he's under no obligation, blah, blah, blah, but he has managed to really piss a lot of people off with the way he's handled things, plus the way that he lets people know he goes off to conventions and writes other books, all while his next book languishes.
I'm sure Tor is bitching him out, but unless HBO makes it a condition that he finishes the series in a set time frame in order to pick up the pilot for Ice and Fire, he may just drag the series out for another ten years (or more).
After all, I've been reading Robert Jordan since 1993. 16 years later and I'm waiting for the antepenultimate book in the series and the writer is dead.
The mystery deepens... I think. *MySmiley*
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons....
- 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM
1270 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two.
- 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM
561 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM*
- 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
470 Views
Titles
- 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM
524 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam"
- 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM
566 Views
Nope, still doesn't work.
- 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM
544 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
- 18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
491 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
- 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
440 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks
- 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM
441 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM
407 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM
415 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions.
- 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM
391 Views
I see the reason in that.
- 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM
589 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already
- 20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM
510 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off.
- 18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM
425 Views
Sometimes ...
- 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM
496 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
- 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
525 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety.
- 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM
486 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance?
- 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM
521 Views
damn you are rude *NM*
- 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM
402 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring.
- 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM
536 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly?
- 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM
499 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM
417 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults.
- 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM
431 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin.
- 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM
429 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
- 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
455 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was.
- 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
456 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM
414 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM
360 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM
419 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument.
- 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
469 Views
Agreed.
- 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM
450 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'.
- 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM
460 Views
But a promise was never made.
- 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM
448 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM
422 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin
- 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM
474 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play
- 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM
451 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book
- 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
486 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM
438 Views
Exceptions prove the rule...
- 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM
420 Views



