Active Users:765 Time:16/06/2026 02:25:52 AM
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM* Artsapat Send a noteboard - 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
We got half of a book when he published A Feast for Crows. He gutted half of the plotlines and saved the rest for a second book that is now taking the name of what was supposed to be the last book in the series. The book that was originally going to be A Dance With Dragons is now one or more books with no title as of yet.

A Feast for Crows was a disappointing book because some of peoples' favorite characters just weren't in it. In fact, it's safe to say that the LEAST popular characters were all bunched into A Feast for Crows, while the most popular are all, so he says, in A Dance With Dragons. Now granted, he's taken this long with a book that was supposedly structurally done back when A Feast for Crows came out.

I understand that he's under no obligation, blah, blah, blah, but he has managed to really piss a lot of people off with the way he's handled things, plus the way that he lets people know he goes off to conventions and writes other books, all while his next book languishes.

I'm sure Tor is bitching him out, but unless HBO makes it a condition that he finishes the series in a set time frame in order to pick up the pilot for Ice and Fire, he may just drag the series out for another ten years (or more).

After all, I've been reading Robert Jordan since 1993. 16 years later and I'm waiting for the antepenultimate book in the series and the writer is dead.
The mystery deepens... I think. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons.... - 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM 1277 Views
Welcome my son....welcome to the machine...... *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:06:36 AM 444 Views
lol Nice. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:28:08 AM 431 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. - 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM 571 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM* - 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM 480 Views
Titles - 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM 532 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam" - 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM 576 Views
Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM 551 Views
Re: Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 10:46:59 PM 421 Views
Is this the thread in which you'll FINALLY reveal... - 20/09/2009 12:31:49 AM 450 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM* - 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM 448 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks - 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM 447 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM 415 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM 422 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions. - 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM 398 Views
I see the reason in that. - 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM 598 Views
He might be a good comic book author, I don't know - 20/09/2009 03:05:15 AM 472 Views
I see where there might be a misunderstanding. - 20/09/2009 03:05:24 AM 521 Views
You're the man, Wert. - 20/09/2009 03:29:41 AM 504 Views
Still ruling WOT, I see. How's that going? *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:26:15 AM 394 Views
Very well, thanks - 18/09/2009 04:05:16 AM 473 Views
One thing I got to say about Robert Jordan... - 18/09/2009 03:40:20 AM 579 Views
Sometimes ... - 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM 503 Views
I agree! - 18/09/2009 01:39:04 PM 484 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder. - 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM 532 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety. - 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM 495 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance? - 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM 529 Views
damn you are rude *NM* - 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM 410 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring. - 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM 543 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly? - 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM 525 Views
For several reasons. *NM* - 19/09/2009 10:15:38 PM 387 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM 445 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults. - 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM 439 Views
What would you call a good start? - 20/09/2009 03:25:46 AM 426 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin. - 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM 435 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been. - 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM 463 Views
That is factually incorrect. *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:38:06 AM 387 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was. - 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM 463 Views
Depends on which section of wotmania you're thinking about - 20/09/2009 06:54:00 AM 470 Views
Precisely. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:30:12 AM 388 Views
I half agree... - 20/09/2009 04:35:22 AM 449 Views
What's with the ad hominems, Tom? - 20/09/2009 06:57:33 AM 424 Views
Irony overdose. Again. - 19/09/2009 06:28:49 AM 452 Views
WTF? - 20/09/2009 01:49:23 AM 480 Views
- 20/09/2009 03:00:53 AM 463 Views
that would be very counter productive - 18/09/2009 10:50:01 PM 425 Views
Depends on what you want. - 18/09/2009 11:26:54 PM 416 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument. - 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM 479 Views
Agreed. - 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM 458 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'. - 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM 468 Views
But a promise was never made. - 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM 458 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM 431 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM 484 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play - 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM 458 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book - 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM 491 Views
Excellent point. - 19/09/2009 10:09:36 PM 547 Views
Re: Excellent point. - 20/09/2009 12:21:21 AM 474 Views
That would be the best policy. *NM* - 19/09/2009 11:23:48 PM 373 Views
Re: Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 11:22:25 PM 519 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM 448 Views
Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM 425 Views
Re: Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 10:00:35 PM 444 Views
I think we're winding down here. - 20/09/2009 07:41:15 AM 445 Views
Yeah. - 19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM 477 Views
Don't mind me, I just can't post in the right place. *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:13:25 PM 425 Views