Active Users:1226 Time:31/07/2026 04:27:26 AM
That's the most valid point of the argument. Chas Send a noteboard - 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
not being out yet. I just read ASoIaF over the past two weeks and I'm extrememly frustrated by his little note at the end of Feast for Crows. I mean seriously, saying that he's gonna have DoD out in 2006 and he hasn't even finished the first draft yet as of mid 2009?



I don't think many people would be anywhere near as pissed, annoyed or whatever if he didn't keep making statements about when the book is going to be done and published. Case in point the statement referred to here.


GGK wrote an article about this very thing not so long ago. If you're going to engage the fans and promise them things- don't be surprised when there's backlash.
Reply to message
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons.... - 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM 1288 Views
Welcome my son....welcome to the machine...... *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:06:36 AM 450 Views
lol Nice. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:28:08 AM 438 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. - 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM 578 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM* - 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM 488 Views
Titles - 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM 540 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam" - 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM 584 Views
Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM 556 Views
Re: Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 10:46:59 PM 428 Views
Is this the thread in which you'll FINALLY reveal... - 20/09/2009 12:31:49 AM 456 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM* - 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM 495 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks - 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM 452 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM 424 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM 428 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions. - 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM 403 Views
I see the reason in that. - 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM 604 Views
He might be a good comic book author, I don't know - 20/09/2009 03:05:15 AM 482 Views
I see where there might be a misunderstanding. - 20/09/2009 03:05:24 AM 528 Views
You're the man, Wert. - 20/09/2009 03:29:41 AM 511 Views
Still ruling WOT, I see. How's that going? *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:26:15 AM 403 Views
Very well, thanks - 18/09/2009 04:05:16 AM 482 Views
One thing I got to say about Robert Jordan... - 18/09/2009 03:40:20 AM 587 Views
Sometimes ... - 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM 511 Views
I agree! - 18/09/2009 01:39:04 PM 492 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder. - 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM 538 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety. - 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM 503 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance? - 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM 537 Views
damn you are rude *NM* - 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM 417 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring. - 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM 556 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly? - 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM 536 Views
For several reasons. *NM* - 19/09/2009 10:15:38 PM 395 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM 455 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults. - 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM 449 Views
What would you call a good start? - 20/09/2009 03:25:46 AM 435 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin. - 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM 442 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been. - 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM 471 Views
That is factually incorrect. *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:38:06 AM 393 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was. - 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM 469 Views
Depends on which section of wotmania you're thinking about - 20/09/2009 06:54:00 AM 475 Views
Precisely. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:30:12 AM 395 Views
I half agree... - 20/09/2009 04:35:22 AM 459 Views
What's with the ad hominems, Tom? - 20/09/2009 06:57:33 AM 430 Views
Irony overdose. Again. - 19/09/2009 06:28:49 AM 460 Views
WTF? - 20/09/2009 01:49:23 AM 485 Views
- 20/09/2009 03:00:53 AM 471 Views
that would be very counter productive - 18/09/2009 10:50:01 PM 431 Views
Depends on what you want. - 18/09/2009 11:26:54 PM 424 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument. - 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM 486 Views
Agreed. - 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM 467 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'. - 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM 475 Views
But a promise was never made. - 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM 464 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM 436 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM 491 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play - 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM 464 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book - 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM 499 Views
Excellent point. - 19/09/2009 10:09:36 PM 570 Views
Re: Excellent point. - 20/09/2009 12:21:21 AM 484 Views
That would be the best policy. *NM* - 19/09/2009 11:23:48 PM 381 Views
Re: Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 11:22:25 PM 527 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM 455 Views
Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM 433 Views
Re: Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 10:00:35 PM 452 Views
I think we're winding down here. - 20/09/2009 07:41:15 AM 457 Views
Yeah. - 19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM 484 Views
Don't mind me, I just can't post in the right place. *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:13:25 PM 432 Views