Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
Tom Send a noteboard - 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
People have a right to be irritated and angry whether or not Martin has an obligation. They bought the books based on Martin's assurances that he was working on finishing the series.
Gaiman's "contract" analogy is bad. There is a quasi-contract theory that is used in situations like this - reliance. Martin makes statements about a schedule of printing and we rely on them. I don't think Martin owes me the next book for my "$10" as Gaiman puts it, failing to realize that those of us who buy hardcovers pay more. However, under reliance theory he owes me a refund of the books that I bought in reliance that he would finish on time.
The interesting thing is that if angry Martin readers got together and sued, I'm not entirely sure that the case wouldn't succeed.
Gaiman's "contract" analogy is bad. There is a quasi-contract theory that is used in situations like this - reliance. Martin makes statements about a schedule of printing and we rely on them. I don't think Martin owes me the next book for my "$10" as Gaiman puts it, failing to realize that those of us who buy hardcovers pay more. However, under reliance theory he owes me a refund of the books that I bought in reliance that he would finish on time.
The interesting thing is that if angry Martin readers got together and sued, I'm not entirely sure that the case wouldn't succeed.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons....
- 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM
1311 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two.
- 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM
600 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM*
- 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
508 Views
Titles
- 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM
559 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam"
- 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM
605 Views
Nope, still doesn't work.
- 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM
583 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
- 18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
531 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
- 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
522 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks
- 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM
475 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM
446 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM
454 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions.
- 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM
426 Views
I see the reason in that.
- 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM
628 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already
- 20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM
543 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off.
- 18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM
461 Views
Sometimes ...
- 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM
532 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
- 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
588 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety.
- 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM
532 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance?
- 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM
560 Views
damn you are rude *NM*
- 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM
441 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring.
- 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM
623 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly?
- 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM
557 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM
476 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults.
- 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM
486 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin.
- 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM
466 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
- 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
509 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was.
- 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
495 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM
449 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM
399 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM
460 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument.
- 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
507 Views
Agreed.
- 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM
488 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'.
- 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM
497 Views
But a promise was never made.
- 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM
484 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM
459 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin
- 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM
513 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play
- 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM
486 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book
- 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
522 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM
483 Views
Exceptions prove the rule...
- 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM
462 Views
