The problem I have with Martin is that he makes promises like he was a 10 year old. He gives promises again and again that seem to have little foundation in reality, and that annoys me. If a grown man(particularly someone in GRRMs age range) tells me he will be finished with something in 6 months, I believe him. Grown ups usually makes realistic promises, because in the real world people judge you by your actions. In no other line of work can you give so many empty promises and keep your job/not go out of business. GRRM is privileged in that way, he can supposedly live without worrying about honouring his promises. It would be nice if he acted professionally though, so I could respect him as a man, and not just enjoy his work.
Amongst the more critical crowd, there are two prevailing opinions about this:
Group A wants frequent updates on when the book is coming out, how the book is going, when is it coming out, what POV characters are in it, when is it coming out, how many chapters there are and when is it coming out.
Group B doesn't really care and actually hates it when ADWD is discussed. They'd rather there was no news and no dates bandied around at all for the book until it was finished.
In order to placate Group A, the author has said in the past what he thinks is a possible timescale for the book to come out (although he has never made 'hard promises' about such a date: each date, when given, has been surrounded by caveats and maybes). This then pisses off Group B. But when the author did shut up for about a year and didn't mention the book at all, Group B was happy but Group A got incredibly irate and started trolling message boards, posting crap on his blog, harassing other fans of the series etc until they did start getting dates again. At which point Group B got annoyed again.
It's a no-win scenario.
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons....
- 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM
1311 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two.
- 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM
600 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM*
- 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
507 Views
Titles
- 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM
558 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam"
- 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM
604 Views
Nope, still doesn't work.
- 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM
583 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
- 18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
531 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
- 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
521 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks
- 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM
474 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM
446 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM
453 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions.
- 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM
425 Views
I see the reason in that.
- 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM
627 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already
- 20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM
543 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off.
- 18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM
460 Views
Sometimes ...
- 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM
531 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
- 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
587 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety.
- 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM
531 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance?
- 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM
560 Views
damn you are rude *NM*
- 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM
440 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring.
- 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM
621 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly?
- 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM
557 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM
475 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults.
- 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM
486 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin.
- 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM
465 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
- 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
508 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was.
- 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
495 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM
448 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM
399 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM
460 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument.
- 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
506 Views
Agreed.
- 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM
488 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'.
- 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM
497 Views
But a promise was never made.
- 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM
483 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM
458 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin
- 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM
512 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play
- 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM
486 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book
- 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
521 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM
481 Views
Exceptions prove the rule...
- 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM
462 Views



