Active Users:338 Time:09/07/2025 11:33:36 AM
"It" would have been. "It" was. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
RAFO has definitely not gotten off to the best start as it is, and the inaction of the moderators over this troll is frankly ridiculous at this time.


Oh, wait, did I say that to a GRRM fan? That is simply not allowed! lol
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons.... - 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM 1206 Views
Welcome my son....welcome to the machine...... *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:06:36 AM 375 Views
lol Nice. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:28:08 AM 335 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. - 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM 502 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM* - 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM 412 Views
Titles - 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM 471 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam" - 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM 492 Views
Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM 464 Views
Re: Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 10:46:59 PM 358 Views
Is this the thread in which you'll FINALLY reveal... - 20/09/2009 12:31:49 AM 387 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM* - 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM 378 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks - 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM 384 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM 354 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM 342 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions. - 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM 337 Views
I see the reason in that. - 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM 522 Views
He might be a good comic book author, I don't know - 20/09/2009 03:05:15 AM 405 Views
I see where there might be a misunderstanding. - 20/09/2009 03:05:24 AM 456 Views
You're the man, Wert. - 20/09/2009 03:29:41 AM 435 Views
Still ruling WOT, I see. How's that going? *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:26:15 AM 324 Views
Very well, thanks - 18/09/2009 04:05:16 AM 404 Views
One thing I got to say about Robert Jordan... - 18/09/2009 03:40:20 AM 509 Views
Sometimes ... - 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM 429 Views
I agree! - 18/09/2009 01:39:04 PM 419 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder. - 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM 465 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety. - 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM 425 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance? - 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM 462 Views
damn you are rude *NM* - 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM 336 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring. - 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM 478 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly? - 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM 433 Views
For several reasons. *NM* - 19/09/2009 10:15:38 PM 321 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM 324 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults. - 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM 369 Views
What would you call a good start? - 20/09/2009 03:25:46 AM 355 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin. - 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM 367 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been. - 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM 397 Views
That is factually incorrect. *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:38:06 AM 326 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was. - 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM 403 Views
Depends on which section of wotmania you're thinking about - 20/09/2009 06:54:00 AM 396 Views
Precisely. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:30:12 AM 321 Views
I half agree... - 20/09/2009 04:35:22 AM 386 Views
What's with the ad hominems, Tom? - 20/09/2009 06:57:33 AM 364 Views
Irony overdose. Again. - 19/09/2009 06:28:49 AM 369 Views
WTF? - 20/09/2009 01:49:23 AM 414 Views
- 20/09/2009 03:00:53 AM 404 Views
that would be very counter productive - 18/09/2009 10:50:01 PM 357 Views
Depends on what you want. - 18/09/2009 11:26:54 PM 351 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument. - 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM 401 Views
Agreed. - 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM 385 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'. - 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM 404 Views
But a promise was never made. - 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM 394 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM 365 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM 410 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play - 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM 392 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book - 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM 427 Views
Excellent point. - 19/09/2009 10:09:36 PM 377 Views
Re: Excellent point. - 20/09/2009 12:21:21 AM 397 Views
That would be the best policy. *NM* - 19/09/2009 11:23:48 PM 302 Views
Re: Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 11:22:25 PM 445 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM 372 Views
Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM 356 Views
Re: Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 10:00:35 PM 353 Views
I think we're winding down here. - 20/09/2009 07:41:15 AM 347 Views
Yeah. - 19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM 409 Views
Don't mind me, I just can't post in the right place. *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:13:25 PM 356 Views