Active Users:402 Time:30/10/2026 10:36:31 PM
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
And not give a crap about the trolling of internet fans. He has a huge fanbase that is bound to grow with the TV series. He can afford to ignore the loons who either pester him for information or are pissed at him because he's informative. To hell with them, because most of them will be reading the books when they come out anyway.

However, I do take exception to your statement that is aDwD were to be done quickly, it would have to suck.

As I understand it, the problems come due to the removal of the five year gap, which itself was a great equalizer which allowed Martin to put his characters at whatever point in their arcs he wanted.

He threw that away (maybe justifiably) and did what Jordan ended up doing. He altered to pace of his story so he could align the story arcs of his characters. While it has not (and hopefully will not) reach the slowness of pace Jordan used, he is working to prevent that by coming up with something that is pacy and allows him to align his characters.

For Jordan, the slower pace allowed him to have a story that was still coherent and flowed well, but the deadening of pace angered many fans. With Martin, delay caused by fear of doing what Jordan did has angered many fans.

I can't say which is worse. But the point remains that Martin should not react to fans. He is the best person to decide how to write his series. And that includes deciding when a book is ready for release. It doesn't matter what internet fans think, and he should behave accordingly.
Reply to message
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons.... - 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM 1311 Views
Welcome my son....welcome to the machine...... *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:06:36 AM 471 Views
lol Nice. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:28:08 AM 460 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. - 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM 600 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM* - 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM 507 Views
Titles - 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM 558 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam" - 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM 604 Views
Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM 583 Views
Re: Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 10:46:59 PM 450 Views
Is this the thread in which you'll FINALLY reveal... - 20/09/2009 12:31:49 AM 481 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM* - 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM 521 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks - 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM 475 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM 446 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM 454 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions. - 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM 426 Views
I see the reason in that. - 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM 628 Views
He might be a good comic book author, I don't know - 20/09/2009 03:05:15 AM 503 Views
I see where there might be a misunderstanding. - 20/09/2009 03:05:24 AM 548 Views
You're the man, Wert. - 20/09/2009 03:29:41 AM 532 Views
Still ruling WOT, I see. How's that going? *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:26:15 AM 425 Views
Very well, thanks - 18/09/2009 04:05:16 AM 501 Views
One thing I got to say about Robert Jordan... - 18/09/2009 03:40:20 AM 610 Views
Sometimes ... - 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM 531 Views
I agree! - 18/09/2009 01:39:04 PM 511 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder. - 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM 587 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety. - 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM 531 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance? - 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM 560 Views
damn you are rude *NM* - 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM 440 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring. - 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM 622 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly? - 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM 557 Views
For several reasons. *NM* - 19/09/2009 10:15:38 PM 418 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM 476 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults. - 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM 486 Views
What would you call a good start? - 20/09/2009 03:25:46 AM 473 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin. - 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM 465 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been. - 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM 508 Views
That is factually incorrect. *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:38:06 AM 413 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was. - 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM 495 Views
Depends on which section of wotmania you're thinking about - 20/09/2009 06:54:00 AM 501 Views
Precisely. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:30:12 AM 418 Views
I half agree... - 20/09/2009 04:35:22 AM 481 Views
What's with the ad hominems, Tom? - 20/09/2009 06:57:33 AM 456 Views
Irony overdose. Again. - 19/09/2009 06:28:49 AM 482 Views
WTF? - 20/09/2009 01:49:23 AM 514 Views
- 20/09/2009 03:00:53 AM 512 Views
that would be very counter productive - 18/09/2009 10:50:01 PM 454 Views
Depends on what you want. - 18/09/2009 11:26:54 PM 443 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument. - 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM 507 Views
Agreed. - 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM 488 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'. - 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM 497 Views
But a promise was never made. - 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM 483 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM 458 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM 512 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play - 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM 486 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book - 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM 522 Views
Excellent point. - 19/09/2009 10:09:36 PM 614 Views
Re: Excellent point. - 20/09/2009 12:21:21 AM 504 Views
That would be the best policy. *NM* - 19/09/2009 11:23:48 PM 406 Views
Re: Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 11:22:25 PM 548 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM 483 Views
Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM 462 Views
Re: Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 10:00:35 PM 480 Views
I think we're winding down here. - 20/09/2009 07:41:15 AM 478 Views
Yeah. - 19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM 506 Views
Don't mind me, I just can't post in the right place. *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:13:25 PM 454 Views