Active Users:2325 Time:18/06/2026 11:59:05 AM
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else Tom Send a noteboard - 18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
1. I was hoping Tor (read: Bantam) is putting pressure on Martin. I see that sadly, this is not the case.

2. I said that I had lost interest in the series, and honestly I know a lot of other people who have likewise lost interest in the series. That translates into lower revenue. All of this is true - I stated my opinion, the opinions of my friends and the market effect of that sentiment. Citing Wheel of Time does not really help your argument, either. Look at the general consensus on Crossroads of Twilight - the fan base was drifting. If Jordan had not started to wrap things up with Knife of Dreams the fan base would have been lost. I never said it had reached a critical mass, only that Martin would do well to remember his promises.

3. Martin has a pilot with HBO - are you aware of something I'm not? Did they already sign for a full season?

4. The entirety of the statement "your whole post was about how ADWD was going to be pointless, and nothing in it of any importance was going to happen because those events have been pushed back to a later book" is completely wrong. I never said anything remotely like that.

In fact, to summarize, I simply said (a) A Feast for Crows was bad because the good character lines were missing, (b) the book that was originally designated A Dance With Dragons is a different book as a result, (c) I'm not happy, other people aren't happy and the result on the market could be negative, and (d) this series could drag out for years and years.

Absolutely none of the above are "fictitious points". So I'll just ignore the rest of your obnoxious petty douchebag last paragraph.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons.... - 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM 1278 Views
Welcome my son....welcome to the machine...... *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:06:36 AM 445 Views
lol Nice. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:28:08 AM 432 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. - 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM 573 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM* - 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM 481 Views
Titles - 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM 533 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam" - 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM 576 Views
Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM 551 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else - 18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM 501 Views
Re: Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 10:46:59 PM 421 Views
Is this the thread in which you'll FINALLY reveal... - 20/09/2009 12:31:49 AM 450 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM* - 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM 448 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks - 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM 447 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM 416 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM 422 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions. - 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM 398 Views
I see the reason in that. - 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM 598 Views
He might be a good comic book author, I don't know - 20/09/2009 03:05:15 AM 472 Views
I see where there might be a misunderstanding. - 20/09/2009 03:05:24 AM 521 Views
You're the man, Wert. - 20/09/2009 03:29:41 AM 504 Views
Still ruling WOT, I see. How's that going? *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:26:15 AM 396 Views
Very well, thanks - 18/09/2009 04:05:16 AM 473 Views
One thing I got to say about Robert Jordan... - 18/09/2009 03:40:20 AM 579 Views
Sometimes ... - 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM 503 Views
I agree! - 18/09/2009 01:39:04 PM 484 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder. - 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM 532 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety. - 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM 495 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance? - 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM 530 Views
damn you are rude *NM* - 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM 410 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring. - 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM 544 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly? - 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM 526 Views
For several reasons. *NM* - 19/09/2009 10:15:38 PM 388 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM 446 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults. - 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM 440 Views
What would you call a good start? - 20/09/2009 03:25:46 AM 426 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin. - 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM 435 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been. - 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM 463 Views
That is factually incorrect. *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:38:06 AM 387 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was. - 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM 464 Views
Depends on which section of wotmania you're thinking about - 20/09/2009 06:54:00 AM 470 Views
Precisely. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:30:12 AM 388 Views
I half agree... - 20/09/2009 04:35:22 AM 449 Views
What's with the ad hominems, Tom? - 20/09/2009 06:57:33 AM 425 Views
Irony overdose. Again. - 19/09/2009 06:28:49 AM 452 Views
WTF? - 20/09/2009 01:49:23 AM 480 Views
- 20/09/2009 03:00:53 AM 463 Views
that would be very counter productive - 18/09/2009 10:50:01 PM 425 Views
Depends on what you want. - 18/09/2009 11:26:54 PM 417 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument. - 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM 479 Views
Agreed. - 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM 458 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'. - 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM 469 Views
But a promise was never made. - 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM 458 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM 431 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM 484 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play - 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM 459 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book - 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM 492 Views
Excellent point. - 19/09/2009 10:09:36 PM 549 Views
Re: Excellent point. - 20/09/2009 12:21:21 AM 475 Views
That would be the best policy. *NM* - 19/09/2009 11:23:48 PM 374 Views
Re: Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 11:22:25 PM 520 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM 449 Views
Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM 426 Views
Re: Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 10:00:35 PM 444 Views
I think we're winding down here. - 20/09/2009 07:41:15 AM 447 Views
Yeah. - 19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM 478 Views
Don't mind me, I just can't post in the right place. *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:13:25 PM 425 Views