A promise was made. That promise was not kept. And that is further backed up by his feelings on the issue- the only reason he started the series was because of the promise of completion in the near future.
The note in the back of AFFC says specifically that ADWD "wasn't close to finished yet," (direct quotation) and that it "will be along next year, (I devoutly hope)," (direct quotation).
It was an expression of hope that was then supersceded by other events (the decision to rewrite significant amounts of that material).
Even if reliance theory was applicable, would it not also apply to the quality of the work? Because if ADWD had been published in 2006, it would have been an outstandingly weak book (based on the sample chapters available at the time) and people would be complaining at length about that.
As for the other point, even if ADWD had come out in 2006, there were still two more books to come, and we'd still be waiting for them even now. There never was any promise of completion of the whole series in the 'near future', certainly not in 2006 and not now either.
I guess 'promise' was a bad word choice. I was going to follow up by saying that he should then just stop giving updates- but you took care of that with your divide post.
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons....
- 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM
1310 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two.
- 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM
599 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM*
- 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
507 Views
Titles
- 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM
558 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam"
- 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM
604 Views
Nope, still doesn't work.
- 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM
583 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
- 18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
530 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
- 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
521 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks
- 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM
474 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM
446 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM
453 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions.
- 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM
425 Views
I see the reason in that.
- 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM
627 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already
- 20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM
543 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off.
- 18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM
460 Views
Sometimes ...
- 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM
531 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
- 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
587 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety.
- 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM
531 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance?
- 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM
558 Views
damn you are rude *NM*
- 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM
440 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring.
- 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM
621 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly?
- 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM
556 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM
475 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults.
- 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM
486 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin.
- 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM
465 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
- 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
508 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was.
- 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
494 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM
448 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM
398 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM
459 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument.
- 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
506 Views
Agreed.
- 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM
487 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'.
- 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM
496 Views
But a promise was never made.
- 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM
483 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM
458 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin
- 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM
512 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play
- 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM
484 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book
- 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
521 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM
480 Views
Exceptions prove the rule...
- 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM
460 Views
Yeah.
- 19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM
506 Views



