I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
Tom Send a noteboard - 18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
1. I was hoping Tor (read: Bantam) is putting pressure on Martin. I see that sadly, this is not the case.
2. I said that I had lost interest in the series, and honestly I know a lot of other people who have likewise lost interest in the series. That translates into lower revenue. All of this is true - I stated my opinion, the opinions of my friends and the market effect of that sentiment. Citing Wheel of Time does not really help your argument, either. Look at the general consensus on Crossroads of Twilight - the fan base was drifting. If Jordan had not started to wrap things up with Knife of Dreams the fan base would have been lost. I never said it had reached a critical mass, only that Martin would do well to remember his promises.
3. Martin has a pilot with HBO - are you aware of something I'm not? Did they already sign for a full season?
4. The entirety of the statement "your whole post was about how ADWD was going to be pointless, and nothing in it of any importance was going to happen because those events have been pushed back to a later book" is completely wrong. I never said anything remotely like that.
In fact, to summarize, I simply said (a) A Feast for Crows was bad because the good character lines were missing, (b) the book that was originally designated A Dance With Dragons is a different book as a result, (c) I'm not happy, other people aren't happy and the result on the market could be negative, and (d) this series could drag out for years and years.
Absolutely none of the above are "fictitious points". So I'll just ignore the rest of your obnoxious petty douchebag last paragraph.
2. I said that I had lost interest in the series, and honestly I know a lot of other people who have likewise lost interest in the series. That translates into lower revenue. All of this is true - I stated my opinion, the opinions of my friends and the market effect of that sentiment. Citing Wheel of Time does not really help your argument, either. Look at the general consensus on Crossroads of Twilight - the fan base was drifting. If Jordan had not started to wrap things up with Knife of Dreams the fan base would have been lost. I never said it had reached a critical mass, only that Martin would do well to remember his promises.
3. Martin has a pilot with HBO - are you aware of something I'm not? Did they already sign for a full season?
4. The entirety of the statement "your whole post was about how ADWD was going to be pointless, and nothing in it of any importance was going to happen because those events have been pushed back to a later book" is completely wrong. I never said anything remotely like that.
In fact, to summarize, I simply said (a) A Feast for Crows was bad because the good character lines were missing, (b) the book that was originally designated A Dance With Dragons is a different book as a result, (c) I'm not happy, other people aren't happy and the result on the market could be negative, and (d) this series could drag out for years and years.
Absolutely none of the above are "fictitious points". So I'll just ignore the rest of your obnoxious petty douchebag last paragraph.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons....
18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM
- 1219 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two.
18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM
- 519 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM*
18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
- 426 Views
Titles
18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM
- 483 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam"
18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM
- 517 Views
Nope, still doesn't work.
18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM
- 476 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
- 443 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
- 389 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks
18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM
- 398 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM*
20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM
- 367 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM*
20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM
- 356 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions.
20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM
- 352 Views
I see the reason in that.
20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM
- 537 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already
20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM
- 464 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off.
18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM
- 384 Views
Sometimes ...
18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM
- 442 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
- 478 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety.
18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM
- 441 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance?
18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM
- 479 Views
damn you are rude *NM*
18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM
- 350 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring.
18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM
- 491 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly?
19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM
- 450 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM*
20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM
- 337 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults.
20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM
- 384 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin.
20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM
- 380 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
- 414 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was.
20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
- 416 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM*
19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM
- 366 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM*
19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM
- 314 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM*
19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM
- 362 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument.
18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
- 415 Views
Agreed.
19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM
- 403 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'.
19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM
- 418 Views
But a promise was never made.
19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM
- 407 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM
- 380 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin
19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM
- 427 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play
19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM
- 403 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book
19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
- 442 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM
- 385 Views
Exceptions prove the rule...
19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM
- 372 Views