Active Users:718 Time:03/08/2025 12:12:10 PM
That's the most valid point of the argument. Chas Send a noteboard - 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
not being out yet. I just read ASoIaF over the past two weeks and I'm extrememly frustrated by his little note at the end of Feast for Crows. I mean seriously, saying that he's gonna have DoD out in 2006 and he hasn't even finished the first draft yet as of mid 2009?



I don't think many people would be anywhere near as pissed, annoyed or whatever if he didn't keep making statements about when the book is going to be done and published. Case in point the statement referred to here.


GGK wrote an article about this very thing not so long ago. If you're going to engage the fans and promise them things- don't be surprised when there's backlash.
Reply to message
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons.... - 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM 1212 Views
Welcome my son....welcome to the machine...... *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:06:36 AM 382 Views
lol Nice. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:28:08 AM 341 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. - 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM 508 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM* - 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM 417 Views
Titles - 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM 476 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam" - 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM 498 Views
Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM 469 Views
Re: Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 10:46:59 PM 363 Views
Is this the thread in which you'll FINALLY reveal... - 20/09/2009 12:31:49 AM 392 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM* - 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM 383 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks - 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM 390 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM 359 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM 348 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions. - 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM 345 Views
I see the reason in that. - 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM 529 Views
He might be a good comic book author, I don't know - 20/09/2009 03:05:15 AM 412 Views
I see where there might be a misunderstanding. - 20/09/2009 03:05:24 AM 462 Views
You're the man, Wert. - 20/09/2009 03:29:41 AM 439 Views
Still ruling WOT, I see. How's that going? *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:26:15 AM 331 Views
Very well, thanks - 18/09/2009 04:05:16 AM 408 Views
One thing I got to say about Robert Jordan... - 18/09/2009 03:40:20 AM 514 Views
Sometimes ... - 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM 435 Views
I agree! - 18/09/2009 01:39:04 PM 426 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder. - 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM 471 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety. - 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM 432 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance? - 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM 468 Views
damn you are rude *NM* - 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM 342 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring. - 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM 484 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly? - 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM 439 Views
For several reasons. *NM* - 19/09/2009 10:15:38 PM 326 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM 329 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults. - 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM 375 Views
What would you call a good start? - 20/09/2009 03:25:46 AM 363 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin. - 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM 372 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been. - 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM 405 Views
That is factually incorrect. *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:38:06 AM 331 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was. - 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM 409 Views
Depends on which section of wotmania you're thinking about - 20/09/2009 06:54:00 AM 402 Views
Precisely. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:30:12 AM 327 Views
I half agree... - 20/09/2009 04:35:22 AM 392 Views
What's with the ad hominems, Tom? - 20/09/2009 06:57:33 AM 370 Views
Irony overdose. Again. - 19/09/2009 06:28:49 AM 374 Views
WTF? - 20/09/2009 01:49:23 AM 420 Views
- 20/09/2009 03:00:53 AM 407 Views
that would be very counter productive - 18/09/2009 10:50:01 PM 363 Views
Depends on what you want. - 18/09/2009 11:26:54 PM 358 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument. - 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM 408 Views
Agreed. - 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM 392 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'. - 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM 413 Views
But a promise was never made. - 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM 402 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM 373 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM 418 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play - 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM 397 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book - 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM 434 Views
Excellent point. - 19/09/2009 10:09:36 PM 382 Views
Re: Excellent point. - 20/09/2009 12:21:21 AM 403 Views
That would be the best policy. *NM* - 19/09/2009 11:23:48 PM 309 Views
Re: Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 11:22:25 PM 453 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM 378 Views
Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM 364 Views
Re: Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 10:00:35 PM 359 Views
I think we're winding down here. - 20/09/2009 07:41:15 AM 352 Views
Yeah. - 19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM 416 Views
Don't mind me, I just can't post in the right place. *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:13:25 PM 363 Views