A promise was made. That promise was not kept. And that is further backed up by his feelings on the issue- the only reason he started the series was because of the promise of completion in the near future.
The note in the back of AFFC says specifically that ADWD "wasn't close to finished yet," (direct quotation) and that it "will be along next year, (I devoutly hope)," (direct quotation).
It was an expression of hope that was then supersceded by other events (the decision to rewrite significant amounts of that material).
Even if reliance theory was applicable, would it not also apply to the quality of the work? Because if ADWD had been published in 2006, it would have been an outstandingly weak book (based on the sample chapters available at the time) and people would be complaining at length about that.
As for the other point, even if ADWD had come out in 2006, there were still two more books to come, and we'd still be waiting for them even now. There never was any promise of completion of the whole series in the 'near future', certainly not in 2006 and not now either.
I guess 'promise' was a bad word choice. I was going to follow up by saying that he should then just stop giving updates- but you took care of that with your divide post.
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons....
18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM
- 1212 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two.
18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM
- 508 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM*
18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
- 417 Views
Titles
18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM
- 476 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam"
18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM
- 498 Views
Nope, still doesn't work.
18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM
- 469 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
- 435 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
- 383 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks
18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM
- 390 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM*
20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM
- 358 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM*
20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM
- 348 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions.
20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM
- 344 Views
I see the reason in that.
20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM
- 528 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already
20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM
- 456 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off.
18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM
- 375 Views
Sometimes ...
18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM
- 435 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
- 471 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety.
18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM
- 432 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance?
18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM
- 468 Views
damn you are rude *NM*
18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM
- 342 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring.
18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM
- 484 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly?
19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM
- 439 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM*
20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM
- 328 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults.
20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM
- 375 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin.
20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM
- 372 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
- 405 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was.
20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
- 409 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM*
19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM
- 357 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM*
19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM
- 289 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM*
19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM
- 353 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument.
18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
- 407 Views
Agreed.
19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM
- 392 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'.
19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM
- 413 Views
But a promise was never made.
19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM
- 401 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM
- 372 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin
19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM
- 417 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play
19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM
- 397 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book
19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
- 434 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM
- 378 Views
Exceptions prove the rule...
19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM
- 363 Views
Yeah.
19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM
- 416 Views