Active Users:352 Time:14/12/2025 05:06:40 AM
Yeah. Chas Send a noteboard - 19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM
A promise was made. That promise was not kept. And that is further backed up by his feelings on the issue- the only reason he started the series was because of the promise of completion in the near future.


The note in the back of AFFC says specifically that ADWD "wasn't close to finished yet," (direct quotation) and that it "will be along next year, (I devoutly hope)," (direct quotation).

It was an expression of hope that was then supersceded by other events (the decision to rewrite significant amounts of that material).

Even if reliance theory was applicable, would it not also apply to the quality of the work? Because if ADWD had been published in 2006, it would have been an outstandingly weak book (based on the sample chapters available at the time) and people would be complaining at length about that.

As for the other point, even if ADWD had come out in 2006, there were still two more books to come, and we'd still be waiting for them even now. There never was any promise of completion of the whole series in the 'near future', certainly not in 2006 and not now either.


I guess 'promise' was a bad word choice. I was going to follow up by saying that he should then just stop giving updates- but you took care of that with your divide post.
Reply to message
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons.... - 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM 1234 Views
Welcome my son....welcome to the machine...... *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:06:36 AM 401 Views
lol Nice. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:28:08 AM 377 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. - 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM 533 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM* - 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM 441 Views
Titles - 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM 496 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam" - 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM 529 Views
Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM 500 Views
Re: Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 10:46:59 PM 383 Views
Is this the thread in which you'll FINALLY reveal... - 20/09/2009 12:31:49 AM 414 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM* - 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM 404 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks - 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM 410 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM 380 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM 374 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions. - 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM 363 Views
I see the reason in that. - 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM 558 Views
He might be a good comic book author, I don't know - 20/09/2009 03:05:15 AM 431 Views
I see where there might be a misunderstanding. - 20/09/2009 03:05:24 AM 483 Views
You're the man, Wert. - 20/09/2009 03:29:41 AM 461 Views
Still ruling WOT, I see. How's that going? *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:26:15 AM 354 Views
Very well, thanks - 18/09/2009 04:05:16 AM 429 Views
One thing I got to say about Robert Jordan... - 18/09/2009 03:40:20 AM 537 Views
Sometimes ... - 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM 460 Views
I agree! - 18/09/2009 01:39:04 PM 447 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder. - 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM 492 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety. - 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM 457 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance? - 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM 490 Views
damn you are rude *NM* - 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM 366 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring. - 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM 504 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly? - 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM 464 Views
For several reasons. *NM* - 19/09/2009 10:15:38 PM 348 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM 349 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults. - 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM 398 Views
What would you call a good start? - 20/09/2009 03:25:46 AM 384 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin. - 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM 392 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been. - 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM 424 Views
That is factually incorrect. *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:38:06 AM 354 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was. - 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM 430 Views
Depends on which section of wotmania you're thinking about - 20/09/2009 06:54:00 AM 427 Views
Precisely. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:30:12 AM 347 Views
I half agree... - 20/09/2009 04:35:22 AM 411 Views
What's with the ad hominems, Tom? - 20/09/2009 06:57:33 AM 389 Views
Irony overdose. Again. - 19/09/2009 06:28:49 AM 398 Views
WTF? - 20/09/2009 01:49:23 AM 443 Views
- 20/09/2009 03:00:53 AM 427 Views
that would be very counter productive - 18/09/2009 10:50:01 PM 382 Views
Depends on what you want. - 18/09/2009 11:26:54 PM 379 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument. - 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM 431 Views
Agreed. - 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM 417 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'. - 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM 433 Views
But a promise was never made. - 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM 420 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM 391 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM 445 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play - 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM 422 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book - 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM 454 Views
Excellent point. - 19/09/2009 10:09:36 PM 423 Views
Re: Excellent point. - 20/09/2009 12:21:21 AM 430 Views
That would be the best policy. *NM* - 19/09/2009 11:23:48 PM 330 Views
Re: Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 11:22:25 PM 474 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM 405 Views
Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM 391 Views
Re: Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 10:00:35 PM 386 Views
I think we're winding down here. - 20/09/2009 07:41:15 AM 374 Views
Yeah. - 19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM 438 Views
Don't mind me, I just can't post in the right place. *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:13:25 PM 386 Views