RAFO has definitely not gotten off to the best start as it is, and the inaction of the moderators over this troll is frankly ridiculous at this time.
Oh, wait, did I say that to a GRRM fan? That is simply not allowed! lol
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons....
- 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM
1234 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two.
- 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM
532 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM*
- 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
440 Views
Titles
- 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM
496 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam"
- 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM
529 Views
Nope, still doesn't work.
- 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM
500 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
- 18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
457 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
- 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
404 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks
- 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM
410 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM
380 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM
374 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions.
- 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM
363 Views
I see the reason in that.
- 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM
558 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already
- 20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM
481 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off.
- 18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM
396 Views
Sometimes ...
- 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM
459 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
- 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
492 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety.
- 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM
457 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance?
- 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM
489 Views
damn you are rude *NM*
- 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM
366 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring.
- 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM
504 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly?
- 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM
464 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM
349 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults.
- 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM
398 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin.
- 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM
392 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
- 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
424 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was.
- 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
430 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM
381 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM
325 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM
385 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument.
- 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
431 Views
Agreed.
- 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM
416 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'.
- 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM
433 Views
But a promise was never made.
- 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM
420 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM
391 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin
- 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM
445 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play
- 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM
422 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book
- 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
454 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM
405 Views
Exceptions prove the rule...
- 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM
391 Views



