Active Users:847 Time:09/09/2026 12:29:27 PM
"It" would have been. "It" was. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
RAFO has definitely not gotten off to the best start as it is, and the inaction of the moderators over this troll is frankly ridiculous at this time.


Oh, wait, did I say that to a GRRM fan? That is simply not allowed! lol
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons.... - 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM 1297 Views
Welcome my son....welcome to the machine...... *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:06:36 AM 457 Views
lol Nice. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:28:08 AM 449 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. - 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM 585 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM* - 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM 495 Views
Titles - 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM 548 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam" - 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM 592 Views
Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM 567 Views
Re: Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 10:46:59 PM 439 Views
Is this the thread in which you'll FINALLY reveal... - 20/09/2009 12:31:49 AM 466 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM* - 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM 509 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks - 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM 464 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM 433 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM 439 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions. - 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM 414 Views
I see the reason in that. - 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM 612 Views
He might be a good comic book author, I don't know - 20/09/2009 03:05:15 AM 491 Views
I see where there might be a misunderstanding. - 20/09/2009 03:05:24 AM 536 Views
You're the man, Wert. - 20/09/2009 03:29:41 AM 518 Views
Still ruling WOT, I see. How's that going? *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:26:15 AM 410 Views
Very well, thanks - 18/09/2009 04:05:16 AM 488 Views
One thing I got to say about Robert Jordan... - 18/09/2009 03:40:20 AM 596 Views
Sometimes ... - 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM 519 Views
I agree! - 18/09/2009 01:39:04 PM 498 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder. - 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM 561 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety. - 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM 513 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance? - 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM 546 Views
damn you are rude *NM* - 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM 430 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring. - 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM 579 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly? - 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM 544 Views
For several reasons. *NM* - 19/09/2009 10:15:38 PM 404 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM 461 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults. - 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM 471 Views
What would you call a good start? - 20/09/2009 03:25:46 AM 461 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin. - 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM 451 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been. - 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM 483 Views
That is factually incorrect. *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:38:06 AM 402 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was. - 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM 480 Views
Depends on which section of wotmania you're thinking about - 20/09/2009 06:54:00 AM 485 Views
Precisely. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:30:12 AM 404 Views
I half agree... - 20/09/2009 04:35:22 AM 468 Views
What's with the ad hominems, Tom? - 20/09/2009 06:57:33 AM 441 Views
Irony overdose. Again. - 19/09/2009 06:28:49 AM 468 Views
WTF? - 20/09/2009 01:49:23 AM 499 Views
- 20/09/2009 03:00:53 AM 489 Views
that would be very counter productive - 18/09/2009 10:50:01 PM 438 Views
Depends on what you want. - 18/09/2009 11:26:54 PM 431 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument. - 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM 493 Views
Agreed. - 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM 473 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'. - 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM 485 Views
But a promise was never made. - 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM 471 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM 445 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM 502 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play - 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM 470 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book - 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM 510 Views
Excellent point. - 19/09/2009 10:09:36 PM 587 Views
Re: Excellent point. - 20/09/2009 12:21:21 AM 493 Views
That would be the best policy. *NM* - 19/09/2009 11:23:48 PM 391 Views
Re: Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 11:22:25 PM 535 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM 462 Views
Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM 444 Views
Re: Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 10:00:35 PM 464 Views
I think we're winding down here. - 20/09/2009 07:41:15 AM 467 Views
Yeah. - 19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM 491 Views
Don't mind me, I just can't post in the right place. *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:13:25 PM 440 Views