Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
Tor Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
Because of the fact that it doesn't seem possible to have negative strength in the OP. I don't know if RJ realized that a normal distribution would mean negative strength is possible, though.
The more I think about it, the more I think it has to be skewed. It's the only way Egwene and Aviendha can both be above the overall population mean given the quote about both of them together matching Lanfear.
And now, I've spent about 3x as much time thinking about this as I had wanted to
' />
The more I think about it, the more I think it has to be skewed. It's the only way Egwene and Aviendha can both be above the overall population mean given the quote about both of them together matching Lanfear.
And now, I've spent about 3x as much time thinking about this as I had wanted to

Seriously, what are you going on about? No one ever means "mathematically perfect normal distribution" when they say "normal distribution". It is perfectly reasonable to say it's a normal distribution even if there are no channelers with negative strength, just like it's perfectly reasonable to say height among humans follow a normal distribution, even though there are no people of negative height.
Fram kamerater!
The Bell Curve revisited
29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
- 1541 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
- 925 Views
That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
- 1500 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
- 924 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
- 777 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
- 771 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
- 859 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
- 762 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
- 840 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
- 1062 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
- 843 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
- 804 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
- 819 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
- 752 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
- 729 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
- 767 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
- 706 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
- 712 Views
Absolutely no reason...
30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
- 808 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
- 715 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
- 800 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
- 723 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
- 738 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
- 736 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
- 729 Views
Done
31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
- 1469 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
- 989 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
- 831 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
- 838 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
- 847 Views

That's not what happened...
30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
- 776 Views
I hate to get into these things
29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
- 880 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
- 835 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
- 860 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
- 428 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
- 777 Views
You're pathetic...
30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
- 718 Views
The quote isn't specific
30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
- 838 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
- 1325 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
- 777 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
- 719 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
- 920 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
- 845 Views
Are you sure about that?
30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
- 842 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
- 748 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
- 1081 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
- 859 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
- 737 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
- 870 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
- 819 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
- 695 Views
you're confusing 2 things
30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
- 985 Views
One thing
30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
- 806 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
- 822 Views