Active Users:841 Time:23/07/2026 10:09:56 AM
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
I was always under the impression that they relied on people who came to the tower, they did very little active recruitment and relied on people coming to the Tower, very few of these will be wilders (who are supposed to be stronger?). That way most modern Aes Sedai representation is below what would be "average".

I don't agree about the circle maths though, I always got the impression being in a circle allowed you to do things you couldn't do as 3 individuals but your combined "power" wasn't that of a single channeler who had the combined strength of the 3 in the circle.

As has been pointed out though, your assertion that the highest is exactly twice as powerful as the middle is wrong though, bell curves by their nature don't allow that kind of detail. It's very possible Rand is an outlier many standard deviations of the mean away from the mean. I imagine in actuality he's rather closer than that but it's worth noting for the calculations as it's impossible for the population to actually be a bell curve.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!

I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
This message last edited by TheCrownless on 30/10/2012 at 12:12:51 AM
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1764 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1114 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1692 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1090 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 1028 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 978 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 961 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 955 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 976 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 1013 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 927 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 911 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 917 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1076 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 919 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 862 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 882 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 967 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 883 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 976 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 898 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 904 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 893 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 880 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1674 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1183 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 1004 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 852 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1667 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1252 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 1019 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 832 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 928 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 1007 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 475 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 983 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 887 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 910 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 962 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 981 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 1031 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 1058 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 1051 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 1036 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 542 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 954 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 884 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 991 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 840 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1500 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 938 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 955 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 895 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1089 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 1013 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 1013 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 914 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1261 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 1030 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 899 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 1063 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1186 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 1059 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 1037 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 1015 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 991 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 1001 Views

Reply to Message