Active Users:947 Time:21/04/2026 10:49:17 AM
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
I was always under the impression that they relied on people who came to the tower, they did very little active recruitment and relied on people coming to the Tower, very few of these will be wilders (who are supposed to be stronger?). That way most modern Aes Sedai representation is below what would be "average".

I don't agree about the circle maths though, I always got the impression being in a circle allowed you to do things you couldn't do as 3 individuals but your combined "power" wasn't that of a single channeler who had the combined strength of the 3 in the circle.

As has been pointed out though, your assertion that the highest is exactly twice as powerful as the middle is wrong though, bell curves by their nature don't allow that kind of detail. It's very possible Rand is an outlier many standard deviations of the mean away from the mean. I imagine in actuality he's rather closer than that but it's worth noting for the calculations as it's impossible for the population to actually be a bell curve.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!

I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
This message last edited by TheCrownless on 30/10/2012 at 12:12:51 AM
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1703 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1064 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1641 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1024 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 969 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 916 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 907 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 901 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 923 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 962 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 876 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 859 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 856 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1015 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 870 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 815 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 831 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 926 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 827 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 922 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 846 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 846 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 842 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 834 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1612 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1128 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 949 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 806 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1615 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1190 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 966 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 783 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 869 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 965 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 442 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 911 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 839 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 861 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 911 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 929 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 970 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 994 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 996 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 987 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 514 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 892 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 829 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 939 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 783 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1445 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 883 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 898 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 844 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1034 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 955 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 954 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 865 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1202 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 970 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 842 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 985 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1126 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 993 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 985 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 949 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 930 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 946 Views

Reply to Message