Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
I was always under the impression that they relied on people who came to the tower, they did very little active recruitment and relied on people coming to the Tower, very few of these will be wilders (who are supposed to be stronger?). That way most modern Aes Sedai representation is below what would be "average".
I don't agree about the circle maths though, I always got the impression being in a circle allowed you to do things you couldn't do as 3 individuals but your combined "power" wasn't that of a single channeler who had the combined strength of the 3 in the circle.
As has been pointed out though, your assertion that the highest is exactly twice as powerful as the middle is wrong though, bell curves by their nature don't allow that kind of detail. It's very possible Rand is an outlier many standard deviations of the mean away from the mean. I imagine in actuality he's rather closer than that but it's worth noting for the calculations as it's impossible for the population to actually be a bell curve.
I don't agree about the circle maths though, I always got the impression being in a circle allowed you to do things you couldn't do as 3 individuals but your combined "power" wasn't that of a single channeler who had the combined strength of the 3 in the circle.
As has been pointed out though, your assertion that the highest is exactly twice as powerful as the middle is wrong though, bell curves by their nature don't allow that kind of detail. It's very possible Rand is an outlier many standard deviations of the mean away from the mean. I imagine in actuality he's rather closer than that but it's worth noting for the calculations as it's impossible for the population to actually be a bell curve.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!
I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
This message last edited by TheCrownless on 30/10/2012 at 12:12:51 AM
The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
1622 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
995 Views
That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
1585 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
973 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
839 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
823 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
922 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
818 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
902 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
- 31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
1140 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
917 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
857 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
872 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
819 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
- 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
796 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
- 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
818 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
- 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
758 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
- 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
771 Views
Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
863 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
773 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
- 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
860 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
- 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
785 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
791 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
792 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
- 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
781 Views
Done
- 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
1551 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
1065 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
890 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
- 01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
893 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
904 Views
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
904 Views
That's not what happened...
- 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
848 Views
I hate to get into these things
- 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
941 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
- 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
925 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
931 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
- 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
488 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
- 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
843 Views
You're pathetic...
- 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
773 Views
The quote isn't specific
- 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
889 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
- 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
1393 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
840 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
- 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
792 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
971 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
903 Views
Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
895 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
810 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
- 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
1136 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
913 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
787 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
923 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
883 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
- 31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
773 Views
you're confusing 2 things
- 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
1059 Views
One thing
- 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
879 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
- 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
886 Views
