Active Users:852 Time:20/02/2026 10:48:19 AM
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? Tor Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
I was always under the impression that they relied on people who came to the tower, they did very little active recruitment and relied on people coming to the Tower, very few of these will be wilders (who are supposed to be stronger?). That way most modern Aes Sedai representation is below what would be "average".


If weaker women are more likely to want to become Aes Sedai, that would explain everything. The question is how would that mechanism work, given that most people don't know if they can channel when they go to the Tower.

Removing wilders from the population of potential Aes Sedai would possibly reduce the average a little, but not enough to explain the 20% of the 1000 novices.
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1661 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1036 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1620 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1002 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 944 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 891 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 884 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 877 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 902 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 931 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 853 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 828 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 835 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 990 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 848 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 791 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 800 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 895 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 800 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 893 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 825 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 823 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 820 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 810 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1584 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1098 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 925 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 775 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1596 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1157 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 942 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 762 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 847 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 934 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 434 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 876 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 813 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 836 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 885 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 903 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 942 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 977 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 962 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 960 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 502 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 877 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 806 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 920 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 754 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1419 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 860 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 875 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 819 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 999 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 932 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 921 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 840 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1176 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 947 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 817 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 955 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1095 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 967 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 956 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 928 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 910 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 918 Views

Reply to Message