If the Wheel of Time really turns forever, and if every channeler gets a new draw from the distribution of strength with each rebirth, then if the distribution allows for negative strength, eventually there has to be someone with negative strength.
I'm not saying that every channeler does get a new draw, but it does seem like channeling strength isn't constant across lifetimes, unless none of the strong female AS from the AoL has been reborn between the AoL and the Third Age. Or at least between when the AS started keeping track of these things and the Third Age.
I'm simplifying things a great deal, but I know you get what I'm saying.
I'm not saying that every channeler does get a new draw, but it does seem like channeling strength isn't constant across lifetimes, unless none of the strong female AS from the AoL has been reborn between the AoL and the Third Age. Or at least between when the AS started keeping track of these things and the Third Age.
I'm simplifying things a great deal, but I know you get what I'm saying.
This message last edited by HousealThor on 30/10/2012 at 05:24:05 PM
The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
1760 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
1110 Views
That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
1688 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
1086 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
932 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
917 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
1040 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
911 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
1003 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
- 31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
1256 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
1026 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
959 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
974 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
926 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
- 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
908 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
- 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
916 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
- 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
860 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
- 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
881 Views
Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
965 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
881 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
- 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
974 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
- 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
896 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
901 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
891 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
- 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
878 Views
Done
- 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
1670 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
1181 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
1000 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
- 01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
993 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
1005 Views
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
1005 Views
That's not what happened...
- 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
981 Views
I hate to get into these things
- 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
1054 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
- 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
1049 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
1034 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
- 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
542 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
- 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
951 Views
You're pathetic...
- 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
882 Views
The quote isn't specific
- 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
989 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
- 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
1498 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
953 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
- 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
891 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
1087 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
1011 Views
Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
1010 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
910 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
- 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
1259 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
1028 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
897 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
1060 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
997 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
- 31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
878 Views
you're confusing 2 things
- 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
1184 Views
One thing
- 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
987 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
- 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
998 Views
