Active Users:804 Time:16/03/2026 11:09:58 PM
One thing HousealThor Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
If the Wheel of Time really turns forever, and if every channeler gets a new draw from the distribution of strength with each rebirth, then if the distribution allows for negative strength, eventually there has to be someone with negative strength.

I'm not saying that every channeler does get a new draw, but it does seem like channeling strength isn't constant across lifetimes, unless none of the strong female AS from the AoL has been reborn between the AoL and the Third Age. Or at least between when the AS started keeping track of these things and the Third Age.

I'm simplifying things a great deal, but I know you get what I'm saying.
This message last edited by HousealThor on 30/10/2012 at 05:24:05 PM
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1678 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1049 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1626 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1008 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 951 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 901 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 890 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 886 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 908 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 940 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 861 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 839 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 841 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 995 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 854 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 797 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 810 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 903 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 807 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 902 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 833 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 831 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 829 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 819 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1595 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1110 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 935 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 787 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1606 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1167 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 951 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 771 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 856 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 944 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 436 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 886 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 821 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 847 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 894 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 912 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 950 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 982 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 971 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 968 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 504 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 883 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 818 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 926 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 763 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1429 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 873 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 882 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 823 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1007 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 942 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 930 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 847 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1188 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 956 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 826 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 964 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1106 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 974 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 966 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 934 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 919 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 926 Views

Reply to Message