let's not mix up "random" and "representative"
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM
Egwene should have found 100,000 novices and a control group to fit into your theory.
If passing through miscellaneous villages, testing everyone, and accepting everyone isn't a random sample then god help us all.
1. The AS did not go about testing every woman they saw. They tested and accepted any woman who approached them. It's a very different thing.
2. While there is "randomness" in how these women came to join the AS camp, there is nothing to say they are also "representative" of all women with the ability to Channel. In fact we know for certain they are not representative as they are as a whole too weak.
As I've been discussing with Tor there are many potential reasons for this group not being representative of the total channeling population, personally I think it's some level of genetic culling in the region, sort of the reverse as we've seen in the TR where there is a disproportionate number of strong channelers.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
The Bell Curve revisited
29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
- 1499 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
- 897 Views
That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
- 1469 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
- 902 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
- 748 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
- 747 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
- 832 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
- 735 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
- 813 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
- 1032 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
- 816 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
- 778 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
- 793 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
- 723 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
- 699 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
- 737 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
- 676 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
- 682 Views
Absolutely no reason...
30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
- 783 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
- 685 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
- 771 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
- 693 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
- 708 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
- 707 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
- 702 Views
Done
31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
- 1374 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
- 963 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
- 732 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
- 742 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
- 822 Views

That's not what happened...
30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
- 745 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative"
30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM
- 777 Views
I hate to get into these things
29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
- 851 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
- 809 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
- 834 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
- 413 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
- 753 Views
You're pathetic...
30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
- 695 Views
The quote isn't specific
30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
- 815 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
- 1300 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
- 751 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
- 689 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
- 891 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
- 816 Views
Are you sure about that?
30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
- 817 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
- 722 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
- 1022 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
- 829 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
- 713 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
- 842 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
- 793 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
- 630 Views
you're confusing 2 things
30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
- 891 Views
One thing
30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
- 780 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
- 800 Views