That it's additive and multiplied?
i.e.
Angreal might give multiplier X2 on base plus some fixed amount? This would explain how stronger channelers get more, but also explain how someone weak would get a large benefit.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
3250 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1606 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1339 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1730 Views
Would you consider...
- 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM
1398 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1463 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1550 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1395 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1327 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1359 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1443 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
1207 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1458 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1319 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1427 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
1279 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1431 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1624 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1487 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1456 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1466 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
1264 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1682 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1682 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1704 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1457 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1803 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1431 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1748 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1427 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1337 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
1270 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
1325 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1326 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
1260 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1377 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
1185 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1447 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way 
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
764 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
764 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
722 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
1272 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1324 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1388 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1359 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1334 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1449 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
1187 Views