That it's additive and multiplied?
i.e.
Angreal might give multiplier X2 on base plus some fixed amount? This would explain how stronger channelers get more, but also explain how someone weak would get a large benefit.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
2744 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1401 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1110 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1500 Views
Would you consider...
- 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM
1216 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1250 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1343 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1193 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1108 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1156 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1235 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
1012 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1242 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1137 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1222 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
1053 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1230 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1398 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1310 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1280 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1257 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
1076 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1480 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1443 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1468 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1242 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1542 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1256 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1557 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1228 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1136 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
1060 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
1088 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1120 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
1073 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1193 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
966 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1207 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way 
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
660 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
660 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
622 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
1086 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1097 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1196 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1153 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1103 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1248 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
990 Views