That it's additive and multiplied?
i.e.
Angreal might give multiplier X2 on base plus some fixed amount? This would explain how stronger channelers get more, but also explain how someone weak would get a large benefit.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
3330 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1642 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1372 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1765 Views
Would you consider...
- 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM
1438 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1497 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1589 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1433 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1366 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1394 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1473 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
1242 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1495 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1362 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1457 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
1309 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1458 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1660 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1511 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1486 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1516 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
1299 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1706 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1719 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1745 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1495 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1833 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1466 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1778 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1464 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1372 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
1303 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
1362 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1366 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
1288 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1421 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
1219 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1488 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way 
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
783 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
783 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
733 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
1301 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1358 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1425 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1384 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1365 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1487 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
1221 Views