Active Users:1694 Time:31/10/2025 10:37:27 AM
Not the crux of the debate... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM

I don't see any issues with how you think the Power flows into channelers. Only that it would affect shileding. We know for a fact that shielding is a matter of concentration (on both ends). So couldn't just as convincing a case be made, using exactly how you visualize things, that men, who need to focus so much on controlling saidin, are a lot more susceptible to shields?

We've only seen the strongest men have no issues shielding women. In fact, even Rand says shielding Shalon takes a considerable amount of the OP. We've seen no weaker men claim any ease in shielding women, and there have been multiple instances where this could have been stated.

Instead, all we have is RJ saying that shielding someone of the opposite sex is harder. He doesn't say men have it easier than women.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2956 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1359 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1505 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1214 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1610 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1305 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1360 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1443 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1310 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1226 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1251 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1342 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1099 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1368 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1226 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1314 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1171 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1336 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1512 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1407 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1359 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1343 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1157 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1577 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 716 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1564 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1597 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1354 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1691 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1340 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1649 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1332 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1235 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1554 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1588 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1162 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1221 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1215 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1155 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1281 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1081 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1339 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 705 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 670 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1186 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1234 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1290 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1254 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1228 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1350 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1093 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1133 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1018 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1015 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1172 Views

Reply to Message