Active Users:430 Time:16/06/2025 07:29:22 PM
Not really though darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM

View original post
I don't see any issues with how you think the Power flows into channelers. Only that it would affect shileding. We know for a fact that shielding is a matter of concentration (on both ends). So couldn't just as convincing a case be made, using exactly how you visualize things, that men, who need to focus so much on controlling saidin, are a lot more susceptible to shields?

We've only seen the strongest men have no issues shielding women. In fact, even Rand says shielding Shalon takes a considerable amount of the OP. We've seen no weaker men claim any ease in shielding women, and there have been multiple instances where this could have been stated.

Instead, all we have is RJ saying that shielding someone of the opposite sex is harder. He doesn't say men have it easier than women.


We've never once seen any man struggle to hold a woman, but we've seen many instances of women being unable to shield men. It's intuitively obvious that opposite sex shielding is more difficult in general and that shielding requires quite a bit of power in general. I'm attempting to theorize on WHY this is the case.

It seems to me that part of this reason is because of the nature of the relationship with the OP and each sex. A shield for a man would need to be constructed in a way that would allow for the very aggressive flow of saidin, while a shield for a woman would need to be more flexible to allow for the more immersive flow of saidar.

In theory a shield woven for a woman and placed on a man would tear/rip apart quickly because it's not rigid enough to absorb the velocity of saidin coming at it (assuming strength is in the proper range for a man to be able to break a woman's shield etc). Just as a rigid shield designed to hold a man would shatter rather easily from the mass of saidar coming at it.

Naturally overall strength will make an impact, but I think this is why a woman can easily be held by a weaker woman and to be honest I believe it's easier for a man to shield a woman than it is for a woman to shield a man. I also believe it is easier for a man to shield a man but overall I think it's just harder to shield a man in general

man shielding woman < woman shielding woman < man shielding man < woman shielding man

Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2744 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1267 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1401 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1110 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1500 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1216 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1250 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1343 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1193 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1108 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1156 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1235 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1013 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1242 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1137 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1222 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1053 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1230 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1398 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1310 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1280 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1257 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1076 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1480 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 652 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1443 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1468 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1242 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1542 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1256 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1557 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1228 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1136 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1441 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1497 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1060 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1088 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1120 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1073 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1193 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 967 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1207 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 660 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 622 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1086 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1097 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1196 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1153 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1103 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1248 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 990 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1027 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 944 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 884 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1086 Views

Reply to Message