Active Users:700 Time:18/03/2026 01:09:56 AM
thanks darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM

View original post

Berowin directly says in her quote that her secret is practice. She's probably good with Spirit but she's clearly a woman who has spent decades playing with this weave and making it more efficient. It's possible that many different shields are possible. I don't think anyone, including the Forsaken, have taken the time to practice shielding to that degree but they do perhaps know of ways to weave stronger lattices that exceed Aes Sedai shields. We know from Elayne that practicing with Air made her very powerful with it, and Leane/Suian learned to work more efficiently with less saidar. Demandred said that he's had so much time to study war and dueling that no mortal man can match him, so there's a general theme of practice making perfect. It likely extends to the Power too.

Berowin probably found something new... A soft shield that bends. I suspect the standard weave is like a net made of rope and that perhaps some AOL individuals know how to weave shields made of metal wire. This is why Osan'gar says he can get around any shield.... The knot is where the flaw lies.

I think your theory is original and explains many shielding dilemmas in the series.


I suspect that like nearly everything else from the AoL, Shielding probably was something that was taught in a way that made the individual as effective as they could be with the weaves available. Perhaps there were shield weaves that incorporated other (or even all) flows of the Power that allowed for those weaker in Spirit to still be effective at shielding. I could see how earth, air or water could help strengthen a shield and how fire could assist with cutting off someone already holding the source. I always felt like AoL training incorporated assessing an individual's flow strength and weaves were taught that would maximize said individual's effectiveness with any given area of OP use. Thus a man very weak in Spirit might still be able to shield if he as taught a weave that incorporated fire or earth.

IMO this plays into the Aes Sedai losing so much knowledge. Eventually training was made into a "one-size-fits-all" class which eventually lent itself to only those with the strongest potential or an obvious Talent could excel and effectively perform the specific weaves required to become Aes Sedai. Modern Aes Sedai seem to only know one or two weaves for any given effect and those who are weak simply accept that they cannot move forward with these weaves.

Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 3250 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1482 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1606 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1338 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1728 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1397 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1462 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1548 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1395 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1325 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1358 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1443 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1205 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1456 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1317 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1427 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1279 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1431 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1623 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1487 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1456 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1466 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1264 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1682 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 747 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1682 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1704 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1457 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1802 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1431 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1748 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1427 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1337 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1676 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1692 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1268 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1324 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1325 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1260 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1376 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1183 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1446 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 764 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 722 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1272 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1322 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1388 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1359 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1332 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1448 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1186 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1211 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1104 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1119 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1266 Views

Reply to Message