The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this
fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM
View original post
If someone can draw more than this much above their maximum it would seem odd given how many times we've heard about the dangers of overdrawing.
If someone can draw more than this much above their maximum it would seem odd given how many times we've heard about the dangers of overdrawing.
Why? You can overdraw as massively as you want. The constant thing is that you will either be burned out, or straight out die. The best evidence for this is Lews Therin, who, with no angreal or sa'angreal, overdrew enough to create a mountain taller than Everest.
From there, the rest of your argument collapses...
Gonna miss these discussions. Was fun to lay this to bed.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
- 2480 Views
Uhhh...
12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
- 1311 Views
Yet there are problems with either
15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
- 1016 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
- 1270 Views
random thought on Shielding
19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
- 1151 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
- 1244 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
- 1095 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
- 1012 Views
it's a visualization thing really
20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
- 1057 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
- 1112 Views
Not really though
21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
- 917 Views
I always explained it as
21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
- 1141 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
- 1032 Views
That's precisely my point
21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
- 1120 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
- 961 Views
There's actual evidence:
22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
- 1130 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
- 1294 Views
Whoa..
22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
- 1212 Views
Not at all
22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
- 1177 Views
Wonderful
22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
- 1162 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
- 977 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
- 1257 Views
Hmmm....
23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
- 1219 Views
Let me clear this up
25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
- 1359 Views
Some more quotes
25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
- 1139 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
- 1419 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
- 1155 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
- 1334 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
- 1125 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
- 1036 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
- 961 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
- 985 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
- 1029 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
- 984 Views
Simple
19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
- 1100 Views
Not at all
19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
- 867 Views
Huh?
20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
- 1106 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way
*NM*
20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
- 581 Views

I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
- 541 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
- 989 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
- 1001 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
- 1100 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
- 1058 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
- 1010 Views
Uhhh...
22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
- 1151 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
- 897 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this
03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM
- 928 Views