Active Users:529 Time:04/03/2026 02:22:19 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM* DREWRULESWOT! Send a noteboard - 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
We got half of a book when he published A Feast for Crows. He gutted half of the plotlines and saved the rest for a second book that is now taking the name of what was supposed to be the last book in the series. The book that was originally going to be A Dance With Dragons is now one or more books with no title as of yet.
Haha ya, that was in his little author's note. I think I saw the titles of the next two after DoD being about winter and spring. Something like winds of winter and dream of spring.
A Feast for Crows was a disappointing book because some of peoples' favorite characters just weren't in it. In fact, it's safe to say that the LEAST popular characters were all bunched into A Feast for Crows, while the most popular are all, so he says, in A Dance With Dragons. Now granted, he's taken this long with a book that was supposedly structurally done back when A Feast for Crows came out.
Seriously. It's way worse than anything RJ did. He never promised deadlines and went three years overdue....
Here's to keeping the spirit of Wotmania alive...cheers to RAFO
Reply to message
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons.... DREWRULESWOT! - 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM 1256 Views
Welcome my son....welcome to the machine...... *NM* Animosity - 18/09/2009 03:06:36 AM 425 Views
lol Nice. *NM* Joker - 20/09/2009 12:28:08 AM 411 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. Tom - 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM 550 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM* DREWRULESWOT! - 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM 459 Views
Titles Werthead - 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM 513 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam" Tom - 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM 554 Views
Nope, still doesn't work. Werthead - 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM 523 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else Tom - 18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM 477 Views
Re: Nope, still doesn't work. imlad - 18/09/2009 10:46:59 PM 398 Views
Is this the thread in which you'll FINALLY reveal... Joker - 20/09/2009 12:31:49 AM 430 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM* Artsapat - 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM 422 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks Tom - 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM 427 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM* Joker - 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM 394 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM* IndigoAjah - 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM 399 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions. Tom - 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM 378 Views
I see the reason in that. IndigoAjah - 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM 579 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already Brian - 20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM 497 Views
He might be a good comic book author, I don't know Tom - 20/09/2009 03:05:15 AM 449 Views
I see where there might be a misunderstanding. Werthead - 20/09/2009 03:05:24 AM 501 Views
You're the man, Wert. Joker - 20/09/2009 03:29:41 AM 479 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off. Camilla - 18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM 413 Views
Still ruling WOT, I see. How's that going? *NM* Craig - 18/09/2009 03:26:15 AM 377 Views
Very well, thanks DREWRULESWOT! - 18/09/2009 04:05:16 AM 446 Views
One thing I got to say about Robert Jordan... Crackbrained Asha'man - 18/09/2009 03:40:20 AM 557 Views
Sometimes ... Nate - 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM 483 Views
I agree! heartbreak - 18/09/2009 01:39:04 PM 466 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder. Tom - 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM 509 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety. Werthead - 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM 472 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance? Tom - 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM 506 Views
damn you are rude *NM* imlad - 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM 388 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring. Tom - 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM 519 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly? Werthead - 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM 486 Views
For several reasons. *NM* Ghavrel - 19/09/2009 10:15:38 PM 367 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM* Joker - 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM 375 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults. Werthead - 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM 420 Views
What would you call a good start? Chas - 20/09/2009 03:25:46 AM 401 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin. Joker - 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM 413 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been. Werthead - 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM 442 Views
That is factually incorrect. *NM* Chas - 20/09/2009 03:38:06 AM 368 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was. Ghavrel - 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM 442 Views
Depends on which section of wotmania you're thinking about Larry - 20/09/2009 06:54:00 AM 449 Views
Precisely. *NM* Craig - 20/09/2009 07:30:12 AM 368 Views
I half agree... fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 04:35:22 AM 429 Views
What's with the ad hominems, Tom? Larry - 20/09/2009 06:57:33 AM 404 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM* Werthead - 19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM 401 Views
"Than", not "then". Learn English while you're at it. *NM* Tom - 20/09/2009 01:47:56 AM 392 Views
Irony overdose. Again. Tashmere - 19/09/2009 06:28:49 AM 423 Views
WTF? Tom - 20/09/2009 01:49:23 AM 464 Views
fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 03:00:53 AM 442 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM* Chas - 19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM 343 Views
that would be very counter productive imlad - 18/09/2009 10:50:01 PM 404 Views
Depends on what you want. Tom - 18/09/2009 11:26:54 PM 397 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM* IndigoAjah - 19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM 407 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument. Chas - 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM 456 Views
Agreed. Werthead - 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM 436 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'. Chas - 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM 450 Views
But a promise was never made. Werthead - 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM 435 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." Craig - 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM 410 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin Asharak - 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM 460 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play Werthead - 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM 439 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book fionwe1987 - 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM 472 Views
Excellent point. Werthead - 19/09/2009 10:09:36 PM 455 Views
Re: Excellent point. fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 12:21:21 AM 455 Views
That would be the best policy. *NM* Chas - 19/09/2009 11:23:48 PM 353 Views
Re: Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin Chas - 19/09/2009 11:22:25 PM 493 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." Werthead - 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM 428 Views
Exceptions prove the rule... Craig - 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM 405 Views
Re: Exceptions prove the rule... Werthead - 19/09/2009 10:00:35 PM 405 Views
I think we're winding down here. Craig - 20/09/2009 07:41:15 AM 398 Views
Yeah. Chas - 19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM 458 Views
Don't mind me, I just can't post in the right place. *NM* Craig - 19/09/2009 07:13:25 PM 405 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules