RAFO has definitely not gotten off to the best start as it is, and the inaction of the moderators over this troll is frankly ridiculous at this time.
I don't see anything majorly wrong with rafo yet, but this kind of trolling definitely has to be controlled. Not that I have kept a check on my tongue...
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons....
- 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM
1236 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two.
- 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM
535 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM*
- 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
443 Views
Titles
- 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM
498 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam"
- 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM
531 Views
Nope, still doesn't work.
- 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM
501 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
- 18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
459 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
- 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
406 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks
- 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM
411 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM
383 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM
380 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions.
- 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM
365 Views
I see the reason in that.
- 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM
560 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already
- 20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM
483 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off.
- 18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM
400 Views
Sometimes ...
- 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM
464 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
- 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
495 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety.
- 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM
459 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance?
- 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM
493 Views
damn you are rude *NM*
- 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM
371 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring.
- 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM
507 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly?
- 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM
466 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM
351 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults.
- 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM
403 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin.
- 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM
395 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
- 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
426 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was.
- 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
432 Views
I half agree...
- 20/09/2009 04:35:22 AM
414 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM
385 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM
329 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM
388 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument.
- 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
433 Views
Agreed.
- 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM
420 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'.
- 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM
437 Views
But a promise was never made.
- 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM
422 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM
395 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin
- 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM
448 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play
- 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM
424 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book
- 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
456 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM
409 Views
Exceptions prove the rule...
- 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM
393 Views



