But at the same time there does need to be some perspective, which is often missing. The author has written precisely two non-ASoIaF-related pieces of fiction since somewhere around 1995. Yeah, he edits other books, but he's been doing that since long before AGoT came out. So why then assume that is the cause of delay on the new book when it was not the cause of delay in the past? It seems at best a superficial argument.
The only thing I have to add here is that, whenever I personally remember seeing Martin discussing one of the books he edited, it was something along the lines of "Hey, this new book that I edited is out now, you should pick it up!" And most people, not knowing a lick of information about the publishing industry, just see "NEW BOOK - BUY IT!" And thus, the "illusion of sabbaticals" that I was discussing.
I think you and I understand each other pretty well here, Wert. On a rational level, I get that all Martin's "other activities" doesn't necessarily mean he's abandoned aSoIaF. I just feel like he does a particularly poor job of interacting with his fanbase these days - and it's not entirely his fault, but it's not entirely not his fault either. And that's the only bit that annoys me.
Thanks for keeping it civil - much more enjoyable that way.

I am made of poison.
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons....
18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM
- 1213 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two.
18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM
- 508 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM*
18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
- 418 Views
Titles
18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM
- 476 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam"
18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM
- 498 Views
Nope, still doesn't work.
18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM
- 469 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
- 436 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
- 383 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks
18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM
- 391 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM*
20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM
- 359 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM*
20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM
- 348 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions.
20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM
- 345 Views
I see the reason in that.
20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM
- 529 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already
20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM
- 457 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off.
18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM
- 376 Views
Sometimes ...
18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM
- 435 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
- 471 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety.
18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM
- 432 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance?
18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM
- 468 Views
damn you are rude *NM*
18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM
- 343 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring.
18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM
- 485 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly?
19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM
- 440 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM*
20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM
- 329 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults.
20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM
- 375 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin.
20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM
- 373 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
- 406 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was.
20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
- 409 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM*
19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM
- 358 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM*
19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM
- 289 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM*
19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM
- 354 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument.
18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
- 408 Views
Agreed.
19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM
- 392 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'.
19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM
- 413 Views
But a promise was never made.
19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM
- 402 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM
- 373 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin
19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM
- 418 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play
19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM
- 397 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book
19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
- 435 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM
- 378 Views
Exceptions prove the rule...
19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM
- 364 Views
Re: Exceptions prove the rule...
19/09/2009 10:00:35 PM
- 359 Views
I think we're winding down here.
20/09/2009 07:41:15 AM
- 353 Views
