A Bell Curve is a perfectly normal distribution. Perfectly symmetrical. Otherwises it's not a Bell Curve.
Yes, but as I said, no real data is ever a perfect bell curve. When people say "it's a bell curve", they actually mean "it's reasonably well described by a bell curve".
Edit:
In fact, as the curve is truncated at zero, it can't be a perfect bell curve in any case, as one of the properties of the normal distribution is that the probability never reaches zero.
Fram kamerater!
This message last edited by Tor on 29/10/2012 at 10:40:49 AM
The Bell Curve revisited
29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
- 1500 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
- 899 Views
That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
- 1469 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
- 903 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
- 750 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
- 747 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
- 835 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
- 736 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
- 815 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
- 1035 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
- 818 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
- 780 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
- 795 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
- 725 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
- 701 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
- 738 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
- 679 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
- 683 Views
Absolutely no reason...
30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
- 785 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
- 687 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
- 772 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
- 694 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
- 709 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
- 710 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
- 704 Views
Done
31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
- 1376 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
- 965 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
- 734 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
- 744 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
- 822 Views

That's not what happened...
30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
- 746 Views
I hate to get into these things
29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
- 853 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
- 811 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
- 836 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
- 413 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
- 754 Views
You're pathetic...
30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
- 696 Views
The quote isn't specific
30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
- 815 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
- 1302 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
- 752 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
- 691 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
- 892 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
- 816 Views
Are you sure about that?
30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
- 819 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
- 724 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
- 1025 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
- 831 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
- 715 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
- 845 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
- 795 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
- 630 Views
you're confusing 2 things
30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
- 893 Views
One thing
30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
- 782 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
- 802 Views