A Bell Curve is a perfectly normal distribution. Perfectly symmetrical. Otherwises it's not a Bell Curve.
Yes, but as I said, no real data is ever a perfect bell curve. When people say "it's a bell curve", they actually mean "it's reasonably well described by a bell curve".
Edit:
In fact, as the curve is truncated at zero, it can't be a perfect bell curve in any case, as one of the properties of the normal distribution is that the probability never reaches zero.
Fram kamerater!
This message last edited by Tor on 29/10/2012 at 10:40:49 AM
The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
1678 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
1049 Views
That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
1628 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
1010 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
875 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
863 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
964 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
851 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
943 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
- 31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
1191 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
951 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
890 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
908 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
861 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
- 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
839 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
- 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
854 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
- 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
797 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
- 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
810 Views
Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
903 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
807 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
- 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
902 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
- 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
833 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
831 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
829 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
- 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
819 Views
Done
- 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
1595 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
1110 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
935 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
- 01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
929 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
944 Views
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
944 Views
That's not what happened...
- 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
886 Views
I hate to get into these things
- 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
982 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
- 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
971 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
968 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
- 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
504 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
- 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
884 Views
You're pathetic...
- 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
818 Views
The quote isn't specific
- 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
926 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
- 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
1429 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
882 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
- 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
823 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
1007 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
942 Views
Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
930 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
847 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
- 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
1188 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
956 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
826 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
964 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
918 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
- 31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
815 Views
you're confusing 2 things
- 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
1106 Views
One thing
- 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
920 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
- 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
926 Views
