Active Users:355 Time:08/09/2026 07:52:57 PM
Re: That's incorrect... Tor Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
To repeat my point: A perfect Bell Curve does not reflect the data from the books.


Well, no one in their right mind could possibly dispute that.
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1785 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1136 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1710 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1107 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM 956 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM 941 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 1050 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 994 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 978 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 976 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 1000 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 1039 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 949 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 935 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 936 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1118 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 933 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 880 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 900 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 986 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 906 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 994 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 918 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 920 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 910 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 899 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1699 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1210 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 1025 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 872 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1690 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1272 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 1042 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 849 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 944 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 1025 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 488 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 999 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 910 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 929 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 983 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 1008 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 1057 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 1081 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 1068 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 1059 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 554 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 979 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 902 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 1012 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 856 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1522 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 960 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 974 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 914 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1114 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 1039 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 1035 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 935 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1281 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 1052 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 920 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 1083 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1210 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 1082 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 1066 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 1032 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 1009 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 1024 Views

Reply to Message