Active Users:876 Time:23/07/2026 10:08:36 AM
Re: That's incorrect... Tor Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
To repeat my point: A perfect Bell Curve does not reflect the data from the books.


Well, no one in their right mind could possibly dispute that.
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1763 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1112 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1691 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1089 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM 934 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM 919 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 1028 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 978 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 961 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 955 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 976 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 1013 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 926 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 910 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 916 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1075 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 918 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 862 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 881 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 966 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 882 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 975 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 897 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 903 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 893 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 879 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1674 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1182 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 1003 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 851 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1666 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1251 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 1018 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 831 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 927 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 1006 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 475 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 982 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 886 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 909 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 960 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 980 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 1030 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 1057 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 1050 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 1036 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 542 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 953 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 883 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 990 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 839 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1499 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 938 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 954 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 895 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1088 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 1012 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 1012 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 913 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1260 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 1029 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 899 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 1061 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1185 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 1058 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 1035 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 1014 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 990 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 1000 Views

Reply to Message