Active Users:352 Time:17/06/2025 01:43:32 PM
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well... Shannow Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
To repeat my point: A perfect Bell Curve does not reflect the data from the books.


Well, no one in their right mind could possibly dispute that.


I cannot comment on their state of mind. They dogmatically try and fit the data into the Bell Curve distribution, which simply cannot apply in the way that they wish it to. The evidence refutes it.
This message last edited by Shannow on 29/10/2012 at 10:45:49 AM
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1527 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 912 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1485 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 912 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM 764 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM 757 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well... - 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM 846 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 831 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 774 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 791 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 789 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 807 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 836 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 737 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 716 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 744 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 890 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 754 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 692 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 697 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 795 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 699 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 785 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 709 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 724 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 722 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 717 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1453 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 978 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 813 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 678 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1484 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1007 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 800 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 665 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 744 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 836 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 386 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 764 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 721 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 723 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 792 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 804 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 824 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 866 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 821 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 846 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 422 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 767 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 706 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 826 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 662 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1314 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 759 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 763 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 704 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 906 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 831 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 831 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 738 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1056 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 847 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 725 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 857 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 971 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 835 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 805 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 817 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 791 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 812 Views

Reply to Message