Active Users:806 Time:04/06/2026 05:54:24 AM
Exactly... Shannow Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM
This validates my point (which you have completely disagreed with before) that Aes Sedai make a terrible random sampling. They're a very skewed sample, and the best example of that is the 1000 novices Egwene's proclamation brings.


RJ said that 62.5% of women were strong enough to become Aes Sedai, yet only 20% of Egwene's 1000 novices are strong enough. What possible explanation could there be for this enormous bias?


Even if Aes Sedai only pick up a small percentage of all potential channelers, there is still no logical reason under the sun why this small sample should be so biased towards the weaker side of the Mean.

The sample should still represent the distribution of the larger population it was drawn from.
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1734 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1088 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1666 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1057 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 999 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 945 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 931 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 925 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 945 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 987 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 908 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 881 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 879 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1043 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 898 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 838 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 855 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 943 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 847 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 947 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 872 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 873 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 866 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 853 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1636 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1155 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 974 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 830 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1639 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1215 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 993 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 809 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 895 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 985 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 454 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 952 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 858 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 886 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 934 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 952 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 999 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 1025 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 1020 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 1003 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 527 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 919 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 856 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 967 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 817 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1474 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 910 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 925 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 866 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1060 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 986 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 980 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 888 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1226 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 996 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 870 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 1013 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1153 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 1025 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 1012 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 979 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 952 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 973 Views

Reply to Message