Active Users:941 Time:19/04/2026 09:08:48 AM
Excellent point. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM
This validates my point (which you have completely disagreed with before) that Aes Sedai make a terrible random sampling. They're a very skewed sample, and the best example of that is the 1000 novices Egwene's proclamation brings.


RJ said that 62.5% of women were strong enough to become Aes Sedai, yet only 20% of Egwene's 1000 novices are strong enough. What possible explanation could there be for this enormous bias?


Look at the TR for instance. We've seen many more uber-channelers come from that tiny region and a much higher % that would be expected from such a small region. Dozens of men and women have been picked up by both Towers from the TR and they are ALL strong enough to be AS.

You are both trying to apply a total population % to isolated regional variations and tiny populations of the overall channeling pool.
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1698 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1060 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1637 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1021 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 964 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 913 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 903 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 896 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 920 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 956 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 869 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 854 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 851 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1007 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 863 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 809 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 825 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 919 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 820 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 917 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 840 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 839 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 836 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 828 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1608 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1122 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 943 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 800 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1612 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1181 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 961 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 778 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 866 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 959 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 441 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 902 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 833 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 858 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 905 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 924 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 966 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 988 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 988 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 982 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 511 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 889 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 826 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 936 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 776 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1439 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 879 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 890 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 838 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1026 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 951 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 946 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 859 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1197 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 965 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 837 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 980 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1120 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 988 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 979 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 946 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 927 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 943 Views

Reply to Message