This validates my point (which you have completely disagreed with before) that Aes Sedai make a terrible random sampling. They're a very skewed sample, and the best example of that is the 1000 novices Egwene's proclamation brings.
RJ said that 62.5% of women were strong enough to become Aes Sedai, yet only 20% of Egwene's 1000 novices are strong enough. What possible explanation could there be for this enormous bias?
Look at the TR for instance. We've seen many more uber-channelers come from that tiny region and a much higher % that would be expected from such a small region. Dozens of men and women have been picked up by both Towers from the TR and they are ALL strong enough to be AS.
You are both trying to apply a total population % to isolated regional variations and tiny populations of the overall channeling pool.
The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
1811 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
1174 Views
That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
1743 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
1134 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
977 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
963 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
1078 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
965 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
1050 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
- 31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
1315 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
1076 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
1001 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
1028 Views
Excellent point.
- 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM
1064 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
966 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
- 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
959 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
- 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
957 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
- 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
900 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
- 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
922 Views
Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
1019 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
931 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
- 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
1021 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
- 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
945 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
934 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
926 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
- 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
917 Views
Done
- 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
1725 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
1227 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
1046 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
- 01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
1039 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
1043 Views
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
1043 Views
That's not what happened...
- 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
1023 Views
I hate to get into these things
- 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
1109 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
- 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
1091 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
1088 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
- 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
568 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
- 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
1019 Views
You're pathetic...
- 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
930 Views
The quote isn't specific
- 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
1053 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
- 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
1551 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
995 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
- 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
948 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
1150 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
1076 Views
Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
1052 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
968 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
- 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
1304 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
1073 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
940 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
1112 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
1050 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
- 31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
922 Views
you're confusing 2 things
- 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
1238 Views
One thing
- 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
1033 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
- 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
1052 Views
