1000 women of a potential field of perhaps millions is a tiny sample, especially when regionally skewed. All that added to the facts the author laid out make it obvious to me that these Novices are non-representative. Personally I think most of the purpose they served was to show that there are a huge number of potential Channelers in the world and that women like Sharina could be hidden almost anywhere
1000 is not a tiny sample, whether there were a million or a billon channeling women. That's just a fact.
However, it is certainly possible that Norther Alataran women are generally weak in the power. Personally, though, I believe Jordan just came up with some percentages to sound scientific, and didn't take the concequences of that in his writing. It's a shame we can't ask him what his thinking was.
Also, why do you bother discussing the bell curve if you feel it is perfectly reasonable for the author to disregard it if he wants to make the already obvious point that strong channelers could crop up anywhere?
Fram kamerater!
The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
1665 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
1040 Views
That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
1620 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
1002 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
866 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
853 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
959 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
847 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
935 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
- 31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
1182 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
946 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
886 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
902 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
855 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
- 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
831 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
- 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM
838 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
- 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
851 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
- 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
794 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
- 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
803 Views
Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
898 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
803 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
- 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
897 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
- 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
828 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
826 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
822 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
- 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
814 Views
Done
- 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
1589 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
1100 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
929 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
- 01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
923 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
939 Views
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
939 Views
That's not what happened...
- 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
878 Views
I hate to get into these things
- 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
978 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
- 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
964 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
961 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
- 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
502 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
- 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
877 Views
You're pathetic...
- 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
806 Views
The quote isn't specific
- 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
920 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
- 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
1421 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
878 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
- 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
819 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
1001 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
935 Views
Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
924 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
843 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
- 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
1180 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
950 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
817 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
958 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
911 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
- 31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
804 Views
you're confusing 2 things
- 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
1096 Views
One thing
- 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
910 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
- 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
919 Views
