Active Users:416 Time:02/05/2025 01:39:25 AM
Its highly specific... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM
Only Rand, Mo, Aviendha and Egwene are in the room at that point.

Rand wants to go kill Rahvin and Moiraine says other might be there, and that 'these two' might be able to overwhelm one of them. Who will they overwhelm.... Ishamael? Moghedien? Does overwhelm mean that they are as powerful as one of the Forsaken or much stronger? We have no evidence either way. I

My personal opinion is that together that are about as strong as Lanfear/Ishamael. Nynaeve only had to be as strong as Moghedien to defeat her.


Do me a favor and read the quote before speaking.

“You have thought of guards,” Moiraine said, “but what if who is with Rahvin is Semirhage, or Graendal? Or Lanfear? These two might overwhelm one such, but could you faceher and Rahvin together alone?”
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1500 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 897 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1469 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 902 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 816 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 763 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 778 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 775 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 794 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 822 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 723 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 700 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 725 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 878 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 738 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 677 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 683 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 784 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 686 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 772 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 693 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 709 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 708 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 703 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1374 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 964 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 733 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 662 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1402 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 927 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 717 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 649 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 731 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 822 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 380 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 746 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 707 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 712 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 777 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 787 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 808 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 851 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 809 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 834 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 413 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 753 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 696 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 815 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 648 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1301 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 746 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 752 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 689 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 892 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 816 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 818 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 723 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1024 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 830 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 714 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 843 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 892 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 822 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 790 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 804 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 782 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 801 Views

Reply to Message