Active Users:839 Time:20/02/2026 12:35:43 PM
Its highly specific... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM
Only Rand, Mo, Aviendha and Egwene are in the room at that point.

Rand wants to go kill Rahvin and Moiraine says other might be there, and that 'these two' might be able to overwhelm one of them. Who will they overwhelm.... Ishamael? Moghedien? Does overwhelm mean that they are as powerful as one of the Forsaken or much stronger? We have no evidence either way. I

My personal opinion is that together that are about as strong as Lanfear/Ishamael. Nynaeve only had to be as strong as Moghedien to defeat her.


Do me a favor and read the quote before speaking.

“You have thought of guards,” Moiraine said, “but what if who is with Rahvin is Semirhage, or Graendal? Or Lanfear? These two might overwhelm one such, but could you faceher and Rahvin together alone?”
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1662 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1037 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1620 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1002 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 945 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 892 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 886 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 877 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 902 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 932 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 853 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 830 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 836 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 991 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 850 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 793 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 801 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 896 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 802 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 895 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 827 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 824 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 820 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 812 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1586 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1099 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 926 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 777 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1597 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1158 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 944 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 764 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 847 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 936 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 434 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 877 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 815 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 836 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 886 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 904 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 943 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 977 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 963 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 960 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 502 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 877 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 806 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 920 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 755 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1420 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 861 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 876 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 819 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 999 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 934 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 923 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 842 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1178 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 948 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 817 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 955 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1095 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 967 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 956 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 929 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 910 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 919 Views

Reply to Message