Active Users:394 Time:17/09/2025 07:48:08 AM
Its highly specific... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM
Only Rand, Mo, Aviendha and Egwene are in the room at that point.

Rand wants to go kill Rahvin and Moiraine says other might be there, and that 'these two' might be able to overwhelm one of them. Who will they overwhelm.... Ishamael? Moghedien? Does overwhelm mean that they are as powerful as one of the Forsaken or much stronger? We have no evidence either way. I

My personal opinion is that together that are about as strong as Lanfear/Ishamael. Nynaeve only had to be as strong as Moghedien to defeat her.


Do me a favor and read the quote before speaking.

“You have thought of guards,” Moiraine said, “but what if who is with Rahvin is Semirhage, or Graendal? Or Lanfear? These two might overwhelm one such, but could you faceher and Rahvin together alone?”
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1560 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 947 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1527 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 941 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 867 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 810 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 823 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 820 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 835 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 872 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 780 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 756 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 775 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 923 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 785 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 723 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 733 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 827 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 730 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 825 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 743 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 759 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 759 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 745 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1490 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1013 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 850 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 710 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1519 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1066 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 840 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 695 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 779 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 868 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 402 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 813 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 751 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 756 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 825 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 833 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 863 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 902 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 863 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 886 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 453 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 806 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 744 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 859 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 697 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1346 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 794 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 803 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 759 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 940 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 870 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 864 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 774 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1102 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 876 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 754 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 888 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1005 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 874 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 850 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 844 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 834 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 848 Views

Reply to Message