1000 women of a potential field of perhaps millions is a tiny sample, especially when regionally skewed. All that added to the facts the author laid out make it obvious to me that these Novices are non-representative. Personally I think most of the purpose they served was to show that there are a huge number of potential Channelers in the world and that women like Sharina could be hidden almost anywhere
1000 is not a tiny sample, whether there were a million or a billon channeling women. That's just a fact.
However, it is certainly possible that Norther Alataran women are generally weak in the power. Personally, though, I believe Jordan just came up with some percentages to sound scientific, and didn't take the concequences of that in his writing. It's a shame we can't ask him what his thinking was.
Also, why do you bother discussing the bell curve if you feel it is perfectly reasonable for the author to disregard it if he wants to make the already obvious point that strong channelers could crop up anywhere?
Knowing it exists and having it effect the books are two different things. The author has creative license to introduce any strength Channelers he likes because the VAST majority of the Bell Curve will remain unseen and have no effect on the story. It only matters for these discussions.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
1662 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
1037 Views
That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
1620 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
1002 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
865 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
853 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
958 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
846 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
935 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
- 31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
1180 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
945 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
886 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
902 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
853 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
- 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
829 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
- 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM
835 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot
- 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM
991 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
- 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
850 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
- 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
793 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
- 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
801 Views
Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
896 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
802 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
- 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
894 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
- 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
827 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
823 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
820 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
- 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
812 Views
Done
- 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
1586 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
1099 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
926 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
- 01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
921 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
936 Views
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
936 Views
That's not what happened...
- 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
877 Views
I hate to get into these things
- 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
977 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
- 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
963 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
960 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
- 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
502 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
- 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
877 Views
You're pathetic...
- 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
806 Views
The quote isn't specific
- 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
920 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
- 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
1420 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
876 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
- 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
819 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
999 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
933 Views
Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
923 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
842 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
- 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
1177 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
947 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
817 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
955 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
909 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
- 31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
804 Views
you're confusing 2 things
- 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
1095 Views
One thing
- 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
910 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
- 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
919 Views
