Active Users:356 Time:17/06/2025 02:15:30 PM
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
If the Wheel of Time really turns forever, and if every channeler gets a new draw from the distribution of strength with each rebirth, then if the distribution allows for negative strength, eventually there has to be someone with negative strength.

I'm not saying that every channeler does get a new draw, but it does seem like channeling strength isn't constant across lifetimes, unless none of the strong female AS from the AoL has been reborn between the AoL and the Third Age. Or at least between when the AS started keeping track of these things and the Third Age.

I'm simplifying things a great deal, but I know you get what I'm saying.


Which means there can be no negative strength and no strength above Lanfear/Rand.

Which also means there are a fixed number of standard deviations on the curve. Given this it seems unlikely that Lanfear's strength is more than a few standard deviations above the strongest AS, who cannot be more than a few above the weakest AS with any expectation of maintaining the Curve the author described. If Morgase is the bottom and Lanfear the top there must be as many standard deviations between Morgase and the middle as there are between Lanfear in the middle. This implies that it is impossible for someone lying at the middle of the Curve to be anything but half way between Morgase and Lanfear.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1527 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 913 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1485 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 912 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 832 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 775 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 792 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 790 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 808 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 836 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 738 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 716 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 744 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 890 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 754 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 692 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 698 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 795 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 699 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 785 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 709 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 724 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 722 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 717 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1454 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 979 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 814 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 678 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1484 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1007 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 800 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 665 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 744 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 836 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 386 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 764 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 721 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 723 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 792 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 804 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 824 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 866 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 822 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 846 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 422 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 767 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 706 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 827 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 662 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1314 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 759 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 763 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 704 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 906 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 831 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 831 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 738 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1056 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 847 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 725 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 858 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 971 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 835 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 805 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 817 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 791 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 813 Views

Reply to Message