Active Users:1512 Time:17/12/2025 05:30:06 AM
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
If the Wheel of Time really turns forever, and if every channeler gets a new draw from the distribution of strength with each rebirth, then if the distribution allows for negative strength, eventually there has to be someone with negative strength.

I'm not saying that every channeler does get a new draw, but it does seem like channeling strength isn't constant across lifetimes, unless none of the strong female AS from the AoL has been reborn between the AoL and the Third Age. Or at least between when the AS started keeping track of these things and the Third Age.

I'm simplifying things a great deal, but I know you get what I'm saying.


Which means there can be no negative strength and no strength above Lanfear/Rand.

Which also means there are a fixed number of standard deviations on the curve. Given this it seems unlikely that Lanfear's strength is more than a few standard deviations above the strongest AS, who cannot be more than a few above the weakest AS with any expectation of maintaining the Curve the author described. If Morgase is the bottom and Lanfear the top there must be as many standard deviations between Morgase and the middle as there are between Lanfear in the middle. This implies that it is impossible for someone lying at the middle of the Curve to be anything but half way between Morgase and Lanfear.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1624 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 995 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1585 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 973 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 917 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 860 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 857 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 855 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 874 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 906 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 820 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 798 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 805 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 959 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 818 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 759 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 774 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 863 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 773 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 860 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 786 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 791 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 792 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 782 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1552 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1065 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 890 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 741 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1561 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1129 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 894 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 729 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 811 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 904 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 420 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 849 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 782 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 803 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 859 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 870 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 905 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 941 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 925 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 932 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 488 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 843 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 773 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 890 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 735 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1393 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 831 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 843 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 792 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 972 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 903 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 895 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 810 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1136 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 913 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 788 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 923 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1061 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 932 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 917 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 894 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 879 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 888 Views

Reply to Message