Active Users:704 Time:18/03/2026 01:08:26 AM
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM

in her assumption that Nynaeve could "do better still"

It's also possible that an angreal offers a fixed amount of saidar increase so that Moiraine's bracelet gives her 85 saidar bringing her to 86.5 when she uses it, and making Lanfear 185 when she picked it up and that the difference between she and Rand at the docks was more about her skill and speed and her inherent dexterity making the advantage more in Lanfears favor (i.e. she would be closer to a 225 male with the dexterity advantage). This would still keep the little fat man angreal fairly normal in what it offered Rand's strength, perhaps it offered him 50-75 saidin based on this model or even as much as 100, which would make shielding 7 average women somewhat feasible, if not a guarantee.

However, the turtle that Elayne used to become 2x Nynaeve would need to offer roughly 105 saidar for this model to work with the text in the books, and would in this case make the turtle more powerful than the bracelet, which seems very unlikely, but I suppose it's possible that Elayne just really doesn't know what "strong v. normal" is for angreal.

Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 3250 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1482 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1606 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1337 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1728 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1397 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1461 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1548 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1394 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1325 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1358 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1443 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1205 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1456 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1317 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1427 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1279 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1431 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1622 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1487 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1455 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1465 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1263 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1682 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 747 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1682 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1704 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1457 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1801 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1431 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1748 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1425 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1336 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1676 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1690 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1268 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1323 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1324 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1259 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1376 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1183 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1445 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 764 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 722 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1271 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1322 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1388 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1359 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1332 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1447 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1185 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1211 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1104 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1119 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1266 Views

Reply to Message