Active Users:579 Time:14/10/2025 07:07:14 PM
Uhhh... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM

I'm having trouble understanding your interpretation of the "Nynaeve would do better still" argument.

We have two options:

1)Angreal are multipliers: So Elayne's strength gets multiplied by X, and this happens to be twice Nynaeve's strength. For Nynaeve herself, of course, multiplying her strength by X would mean access to even more of the OP.

2) Angreal are additive: there's a lot going for this, especially based on what we know about Seeds now. If so, Elayne's level+X is twice Nynaeve's strength. Obviously, Nynaeve herself would do better if X were added to her greater strength.

In neither scenario do we have to assume that angreal somehow work differently based on your strength. They either add or multiply, and they do so evenly for all channelers.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2928 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1346 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1481 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1198 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1591 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1297 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1340 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1424 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1293 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1209 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1234 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1320 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1080 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1339 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1219 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1299 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1146 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1320 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1492 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1395 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1351 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1335 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1146 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1562 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 709 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1540 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1576 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1332 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1673 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1331 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1639 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1313 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1217 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1527 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1565 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1140 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1192 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1198 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1136 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1261 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1065 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1321 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 693 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 658 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1162 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1219 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1270 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1235 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1206 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1333 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1081 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1105 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1008 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 997 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1161 Views

Reply to Message