Active Users:789 Time:31/01/2026 09:55:35 PM
Uhhh... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM

I'm having trouble understanding your interpretation of the "Nynaeve would do better still" argument.

We have two options:

1)Angreal are multipliers: So Elayne's strength gets multiplied by X, and this happens to be twice Nynaeve's strength. For Nynaeve herself, of course, multiplying her strength by X would mean access to even more of the OP.

2) Angreal are additive: there's a lot going for this, especially based on what we know about Seeds now. If so, Elayne's level+X is twice Nynaeve's strength. Obviously, Nynaeve herself would do better if X were added to her greater strength.

In neither scenario do we have to assume that angreal somehow work differently based on your strength. They either add or multiply, and they do so evenly for all channelers.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 3162 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1457 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1580 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1310 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1698 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1376 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1441 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1531 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1372 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1301 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1335 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1413 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1185 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1433 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1291 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1403 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1253 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1406 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1599 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1466 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1425 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1416 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1243 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1642 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 740 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1646 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1676 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1429 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1778 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1405 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1722 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1401 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1310 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1645 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1663 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1245 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1298 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1297 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1234 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1350 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1153 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1421 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 752 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 708 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1250 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1296 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1364 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1337 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1299 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1420 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1166 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1192 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1082 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1089 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1242 Views

Reply to Message