Active Users:1588 Time:20/08/2025 04:44:08 PM
Uhhh... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM

I'm having trouble understanding your interpretation of the "Nynaeve would do better still" argument.

We have two options:

1)Angreal are multipliers: So Elayne's strength gets multiplied by X, and this happens to be twice Nynaeve's strength. For Nynaeve herself, of course, multiplying her strength by X would mean access to even more of the OP.

2) Angreal are additive: there's a lot going for this, especially based on what we know about Seeds now. If so, Elayne's level+X is twice Nynaeve's strength. Obviously, Nynaeve herself would do better if X were added to her greater strength.

In neither scenario do we have to assume that angreal somehow work differently based on your strength. They either add or multiply, and they do so evenly for all channelers.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2855 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1313 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1450 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1151 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1550 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1261 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1307 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1388 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1239 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1159 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1199 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1283 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1050 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1290 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1182 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1266 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1097 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1283 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1452 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1358 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1320 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1299 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1114 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1528 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 688 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1492 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1538 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1291 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1629 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1304 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1608 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1280 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1174 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1494 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1530 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1103 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1146 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1158 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1104 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1230 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1018 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1267 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 678 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 640 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1120 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1168 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1234 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1198 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1148 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1301 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1033 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1072 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 983 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 942 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1130 Views

Reply to Message