Active Users:1409 Time:02/05/2026 08:10:56 PM
Uhhh... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM

I'm having trouble understanding your interpretation of the "Nynaeve would do better still" argument.

We have two options:

1)Angreal are multipliers: So Elayne's strength gets multiplied by X, and this happens to be twice Nynaeve's strength. For Nynaeve herself, of course, multiplying her strength by X would mean access to even more of the OP.

2) Angreal are additive: there's a lot going for this, especially based on what we know about Seeds now. If so, Elayne's level+X is twice Nynaeve's strength. Obviously, Nynaeve herself would do better if X were added to her greater strength.

In neither scenario do we have to assume that angreal somehow work differently based on your strength. They either add or multiply, and they do so evenly for all channelers.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 3330 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1521 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1643 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1374 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1766 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1438 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1499 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1591 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1435 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1368 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1395 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1473 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1243 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1497 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1364 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1457 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1311 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1460 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1662 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1513 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1488 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1518 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1301 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1706 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 764 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1719 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1745 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1497 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1835 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1466 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1778 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1466 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1373 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1713 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1728 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1305 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1364 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1366 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1290 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1423 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1221 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1489 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 783 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 733 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1303 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1360 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1425 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1386 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1367 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1489 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1223 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1240 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1140 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1154 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1299 Views

Reply to Message