Active Users:283 Time:28/04/2024 03:42:11 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM

View original post
I think we just see it differently ... I'm not really sure RJ had this clearly mapped out. Especially since it seems like there weren't even side notes on the subject

Well, okay, but I don't see any viable alternative explanation. If you seriously think a buffer-less sa'angreal can allow for unlimited magnification of the OP, Callandor and Vora's wand are obviously more powerful than the CK, which means Lanfear was wrong about Callandor, as are the Glossaries, the BWB, and the Companion!
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 Sidious - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2142 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect darius_sedai - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1010 Views
Uhhh... fionwe1987 - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1135 Views
Yet there are problems with either darius_sedai - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 824 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either Sidious - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1085 Views
Would you consider... Duke - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 945 Views
random thought on Shielding darius_sedai - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1007 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. fionwe1987 - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1069 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this darius_sedai - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 931 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness fionwe1987 - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 826 Views
it's a visualization thing really darius_sedai - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 881 Views
Not the crux of the debate... fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 970 Views
Not really though darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 736 Views
I always explained it as fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 974 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 843 Views
That's precisely my point fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 985 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 807 Views
There's actual evidence: fionwe1987 - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 998 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position darius_sedai - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1118 Views
Whoa.. fionwe1987 - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1068 Views
Not at all darius_sedai - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1012 Views
Wonderful fionwe1987 - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 986 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this darius_sedai - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 804 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this Sidious - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1104 Views
Petty much *NM* darius_sedai - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 446 Views
Hmmm.... Sidious - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1054 Views
Let me clear this up darius_sedai - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1191 Views
Some more quotes fionwe1987 - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 953 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise darius_sedai - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1243 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise fionwe1987 - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1017 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise Sidious - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1164 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise fionwe1987 - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 948 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing darius_sedai - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 858 Views
Oh well then I agree with you Sidious - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1063 Views
thanks darius_sedai - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1221 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... fionwe1987 - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 788 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw darius_sedai - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 820 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? fionwe1987 - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 858 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me darius_sedai - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 803 Views
Simple fionwe1987 - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 926 Views
Not at all darius_sedai - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 712 Views
Huh? fionwe1987 - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 925 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* darius_sedai - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 500 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 480 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 829 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 847 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 921 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 907 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 848 Views
Uhhh... fionwe1987 - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 996 Views
Funny, I just saw this post darius_sedai - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 715 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this fionwe1987 - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 790 Views
No it doesn't darius_sedai - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 685 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? Dunstan - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 585 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... Dunstan - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 802 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes