If sa'angreal are magnifiers, how are we explaining bufferless ones? Take Callandor. Let's say it magnifies by 100X and you're still safe. So if you overdraw and draw in 200X, aren't you still saying "a lack of a buffer allows access to additional power beyond what the angreal was designed for"??
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
- 2855 Views
Uhhh...
12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
- 1449 Views
Yet there are problems with either
15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
- 1150 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
- 1550 Views
random thought on Shielding
19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
- 1307 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
- 1387 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
- 1238 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
- 1159 Views
it's a visualization thing really
20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
- 1199 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
- 1283 Views
Not really though
21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
- 1049 Views
I always explained it as
21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
- 1289 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
- 1182 Views
That's precisely my point
21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
- 1265 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
- 1097 Views
There's actual evidence:
22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
- 1283 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
- 1451 Views
Whoa..
22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
- 1357 Views
Not at all
22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
- 1319 Views
Wonderful
22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
- 1299 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
- 1113 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
- 1528 Views
Hmmm....
23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
- 1492 Views
Let me clear this up
25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
- 1538 Views
Some more quotes
25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
- 1291 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
- 1628 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
- 1303 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
- 1608 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
- 1280 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
- 1174 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
- 1102 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
- 1145 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
- 1157 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
- 1104 Views
Simple
19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
- 1229 Views
Not at all
19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
- 1017 Views
Huh?
20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
- 1266 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way
*NM*
20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
- 678 Views

I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
- 640 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
- 1120 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
- 1168 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
- 1234 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
- 1198 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
- 1148 Views
Uhhh...
22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
- 1301 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
- 1032 Views