I don't think you can say the Aes Sedai shielding is only male optimized. Nynaeve used a typical AS shield against Moghedien, and Moggy's shield was no different. Nynaeve didn't comment on it. Similarly, no one thought Moggy's shield on Liandrin was different. Only the knot, which was made immensely complex.
Moghedien shielded Nyn in TAR, and she tried to break free and it was a solid wall, no flex reported.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
- 2772 Views
Uhhh...
12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
- 1420 Views
Yet there are problems with either
15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
- 1128 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
- 1521 Views
random thought on Shielding
19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
- 1278 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
- 1362 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
- 1211 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
- 1124 Views
it's a visualization thing really
20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
- 1171 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
- 1257 Views
Not really though
21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
- 1027 Views
I always explained it as
21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
- 1264 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
- 1153 Views
That's precisely my point
21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
- 1244 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
- 1068 Views
There's actual evidence:
22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
- 1252 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
- 1418 Views
Whoa..
22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
- 1330 Views
Not at all
22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
- 1290 Views
Wonderful
22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
- 1273 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
- 1091 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
- 1502 Views
Hmmm....
23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
- 1465 Views
Let me clear this up
25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
- 1491 Views
Some more quotes
25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
- 1262 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
- 1568 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
- 1275 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
- 1576 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
- 1249 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
- 1152 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
- 1076 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
- 1109 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
- 1136 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
- 1084 Views
Simple
19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
- 1208 Views
Not at all
19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
- 980 Views
Huh?
20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
- 1224 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way
*NM*
20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
- 667 Views

I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
- 629 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
- 1100 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
- 1116 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
- 1209 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
- 1172 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
- 1115 Views
Uhhh...
22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
- 1268 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
- 1007 Views