I don't think you can say the Aes Sedai shielding is only male optimized. Nynaeve used a typical AS shield against Moghedien, and Moggy's shield was no different. Nynaeve didn't comment on it. Similarly, no one thought Moggy's shield on Liandrin was different. Only the knot, which was made immensely complex.
Moghedien shielded Nyn in TAR, and she tried to break free and it was a solid wall, no flex reported.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
2955 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1504 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1212 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1609 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1358 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1443 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1309 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1225 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1251 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1340 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
1096 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1366 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1226 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1314 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
1170 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1336 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1512 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1407 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1358 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1342 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
1157 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1576 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1563 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1594 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1352 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1690 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1340 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1648 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1332 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1235 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
1159 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
1221 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1215 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
1155 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1280 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
1081 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1336 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
704 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
704 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
670 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
1185 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1230 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1288 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1251 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1227 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1349 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
1093 Views
