Active Users:1492 Time:23/06/2026 05:58:02 AM
Not at all darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM

View original post
View original post
Liandrin doesn't possess anywhere close to the strength to force the shield to bend or break so the knot is the only thing we need to hear about. You assuming that one of the Forsaken would use the exact same weave as a modern Aes Sedai is beyond silly.

I'm not in the mood for insults so I am out of this conversation.


Why do you consistently ignore that Nynaeve was shielded and called Moghedien's shield a wall? Why didn't that shield bend for her? Surely, since she's as strong as Moghedien, it should.

If you can't rebut that, have the balls to admit it. It is ridiculous that you continually ignore actual quotes.


Nynaeve never really fights against it either. I'm done with this discussion as you continually fall back on being insulting instead of insightful. It's not my problem that you aren't imaginative enough to realize that walls can be made out of many different materials and have many different properties.

Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
This message last edited by darius_sedai on 22/01/2016 at 06:16:57 PM
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 3395 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1541 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1670 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1397 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1798 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1456 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1529 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1616 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1465 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1388 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1421 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1497 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1275 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1521 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1396 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1483 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1337 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1488 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1690 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1533 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1512 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1548 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1327 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1727 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 781 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1743 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1767 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1518 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1849 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1489 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1803 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1494 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1400 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1743 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1746 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1327 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1387 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1391 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1316 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1470 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1251 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1516 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 797 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 746 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1326 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1389 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1455 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1416 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1395 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1526 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1246 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1264 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1160 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1180 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1328 Views

Reply to Message