Active Users:581 Time:07/08/2026 02:14:50 PM
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM

and none of which prove a damn thing about the specifics of the weaves, only that the shields are hard to break and do not seem flexible. I'm attempting a theoretical discussion here. Berowyn proves the point that vastly more effective shields are possible and that Shields can ALSO be flexible. Nothing more and nothing less. Why is this simple concept so difficult for you to grasp?

The second concept is that it's theoretically possible that a stone wall shield is more effective against a man and a more flexible shield is more effective against a woman. I say this solely based on the fact that Berowyn's flexible shield is vastly more effective than the standard shields we see used against a woman than any other shield we see throughout the entire series. I cannot, and have not stated that a flexible shield would be more effective against a man.

I would assert, based on so many other examples outside of shielding, that during the AoL there were likely many variations on shielding that have probably been lost to post-Breaking channeling organizations. This is loosely supported by both Lanfear and Graendal being vastly more effective at Shielding stronger males than anyone else we've seen. I am not, nor have I ever, refuted that they used "stone wall" or firm forms of Shielding, only that they probably didn't use the same technique as modern Aes Sedai, who's Shields would have been instantly destroyed by a Forsaken level male. In fact we know for fact that Verin and Alanna linked are very close to, if not stronger than, Lanfear and their shielding attempts were a total joke, whereas Lanfear nearly succeeds, even before she picked up the angreal.

On a side note, I will state that you are a massive hypocrite for using arguments about "ignoring direct quotes" ... no one on this forum dismisses direct quotes more than you when it suits their purposes. cough Aviendha's quotes about Egwene's strength.

So I'll make this simple so you can follow:

  1. We know a flexible shield enabled Berowyn to hold a woman 38 levels above her with little/no effort

  2. We know that Galina would easily be able to break Mecaras shield with a 13 level difference

  3. Verin and Alanna linked could not shield Rand once he was holding the Power. Likely a maximum of 7 levels weaker than Rand

  4. Graendal was able to cut off and hold a shield on both Aran'gar and Delana despite being 6 levels lower in raw strength

  5. Lanfear was capable of shielding Rand with 5-6 levels lower strength and she clearly used a more effective shield against Asmodean who was 4 levels stronger than her.

  6. Nynaeve was unable to cut off Elayne who was 6-8 levels weaker than Nynaeve

  7. Logain could have broken Nynaeve's shield with a maximum 7 level strength difference

  8. Rand broke through a shield held by 3 women who combined were at least his equal in raw strength given that Sashalle was a level 14, even two very weak Aes Sedai combined with her would have been stronger than Lanfear at the least.

It's not that difficult to realize that there are more effective ways to Shield someone, even someone massively stronger than you are, than used by modern Aes Sedai. It's just as obvious that the standard shields Aes Sedai teach are less effective than the shields used by Berowyn, Lanfear or Graendal. It seems likely that Moghedien's shield on Liandrin was probably a more effective shield as well, admittedly that is an assumption.

Shielding strikes me as something similar to Wards and thus there could be thousands of variations that would have just as many effectiveness levels. It seems, as with so many other things, like the Aes Sedai (likely the Reds) taught their traditional shielding weave and discouraged further study once they decided this was the most effective method.

Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 3517 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1572 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1707 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1435 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1831 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1483 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1558 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1646 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1497 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1416 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1445 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1519 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1303 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1553 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1440 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1507 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1376 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1517 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1717 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1562 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1551 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1573 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1359 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1762 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 803 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1771 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1797 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1548 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1881 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1515 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1828 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1528 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1435 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1770 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1776 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1359 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1419 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1426 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1337 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1520 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1293 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1551 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 824 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 763 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1363 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1427 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1495 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1441 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1430 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1567 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1281 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1291 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1196 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1233 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1362 Views

Reply to Message