A Bell Curve is a perfectly normal distribution. Perfectly symmetrical. Otherwises it's not a Bell Curve.
Yes, but as I said, no real data is ever a perfect bell curve. When people say "it's a bell curve", they actually mean "it's reasonably well described by a bell curve".
Well, that's the solution I'm putting forward.
Which is that RJ actually misspoke when he called it a Bell Curve. In fact, he may have not entirely KNOWN the implications of calling it a Bell Curve.
Because we know that most channelers are weak and only a minority are very strong - and the Guide tells us this was also the distribution during the Age of Legends - and yet a Bell Curve would imply that there are as many channelers of Graendal's strength as there are of Sorilea's strength.
And this is clearly not the case, given that there are so many weak channelers but so incredibly few strong channelers.
To repeat my point: A perfect Bell Curve does not reflect the data from the books.
The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
1662 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
1037 Views
That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
1620 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
1002 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
865 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
853 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
958 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
846 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
935 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
- 31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
1180 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
945 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
886 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
902 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
853 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
- 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
829 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
- 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
850 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
- 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
793 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
- 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
801 Views
Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
896 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
802 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
- 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
894 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
- 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
827 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
824 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
820 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
- 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
812 Views
Done
- 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
1586 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
1099 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
926 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
- 01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
921 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
936 Views
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
936 Views
That's not what happened...
- 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
877 Views
I hate to get into these things
- 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
977 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
- 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
963 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
960 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
- 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
502 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
- 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
877 Views
You're pathetic...
- 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
806 Views
The quote isn't specific
- 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
920 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
- 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
1420 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
876 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
- 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
819 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
999 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
933 Views
Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
923 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
842 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
- 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
1177 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
948 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
817 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
955 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
909 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
- 31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
804 Views
you're confusing 2 things
- 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
1095 Views
One thing
- 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
910 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
- 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
919 Views
