Active Users:775 Time:15/12/2025 02:37:55 AM
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed Tor Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
Because of the fact that it doesn't seem possible to have negative strength in the OP. I don't know if RJ realized that a normal distribution would mean negative strength is possible, though.

The more I think about it, the more I think it has to be skewed. It's the only way Egwene and Aviendha can both be above the overall population mean given the quote about both of them together matching Lanfear.

And now, I've spent about 3x as much time thinking about this as I had wanted to :<img class=' />


Seriously, what are you going on about? No one ever means "mathematically perfect normal distribution" when they say "normal distribution". It is perfectly reasonable to say it's a normal distribution even if there are no channelers with negative strength, just like it's perfectly reasonable to say height among humans follow a normal distribution, even though there are no people of negative height.
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1622 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 995 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1585 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 973 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 917 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 860 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 857 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 855 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 871 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 906 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 818 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 796 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 805 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 959 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 818 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 757 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 771 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 863 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 772 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 858 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 785 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 791 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 792 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 781 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1551 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1065 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 889 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 741 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1560 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1124 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 894 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 729 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 811 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 904 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 420 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 848 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 782 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 802 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 859 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 870 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 905 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 940 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 923 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 930 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 488 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 843 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 772 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 889 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 735 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1393 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 830 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 840 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 791 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 970 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 903 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 895 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 810 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1136 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 912 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 787 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 922 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1059 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 930 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 916 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 894 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 879 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 885 Views

Reply to Message