Active Users:872 Time:23/07/2026 10:08:51 AM
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
INTERVIEW: Dec 5th, 2009
TGS Signing Report - kavorka (Paraphrased)
BRANDON SANDERSON
Ability to channel/souls. I think this has all been reported, but he stated definitively that the ability to channel is tied to soul. He stated definitively that the spark was not tied to the soul but could be affected by a specific body (i.e., just because you had the spark in one life, you could be reborn and just have the ability to learn.) He stated with 85% probability that strength in the Power was not tied to soul, meaning that if you were an uber channeler in one body, you could be weak in the Power in your next body.
TAGS
channeling, one power, souls, channeler strength, rebirth,
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1763 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1113 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1692 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1089 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 1028 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 978 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 961 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 955 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 976 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 1013 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 927 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 910 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 916 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1075 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 919 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 862 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 881 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 967 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 883 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 975 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 898 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 903 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 893 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 880 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1674 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1183 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 1003 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 852 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1667 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1252 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 1018 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 831 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 927 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 1007 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 475 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 983 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 887 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 910 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 961 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 980 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 1031 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 1058 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 1051 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 1036 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 542 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 954 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 884 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 991 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 839 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1500 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 938 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 954 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 895 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1088 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 1012 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 1013 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 913 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1260 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 1029 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 899 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 1062 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1186 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 1058 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 1036 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 1015 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 991 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 1001 Views

Reply to Message