Active Users:914 Time:21/04/2026 10:43:01 AM
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
INTERVIEW: Dec 5th, 2009
TGS Signing Report - kavorka (Paraphrased)
BRANDON SANDERSON
Ability to channel/souls. I think this has all been reported, but he stated definitively that the ability to channel is tied to soul. He stated definitively that the spark was not tied to the soul but could be affected by a specific body (i.e., just because you had the spark in one life, you could be reborn and just have the ability to learn.) He stated with 85% probability that strength in the Power was not tied to soul, meaning that if you were an uber channeler in one body, you could be weak in the Power in your next body.
TAGS
channeling, one power, souls, channeler strength, rebirth,
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1703 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1064 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1641 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1024 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 969 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 916 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 907 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 901 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 923 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 961 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 875 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 858 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 856 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1013 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 869 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 814 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 830 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 924 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 826 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 921 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 846 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 845 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 842 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 833 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1612 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1127 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 947 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 804 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1615 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1189 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 965 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 782 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 869 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 964 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 442 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 910 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 838 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 861 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 910 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 929 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 970 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 992 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 994 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 986 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 514 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 892 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 829 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 939 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 782 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1443 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 883 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 897 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 844 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1032 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 955 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 953 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 864 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1201 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 970 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 842 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 985 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1126 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 993 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 985 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 949 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 930 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 946 Views

Reply to Message