Active Users:360 Time:30/04/2025 09:39:30 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Whoa.. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM

View original post
Liandrin doesn't possess anywhere close to the strength to force the shield to bend or break so the knot is the only thing we need to hear about. You assuming that one of the Forsaken would use the exact same weave as a modern Aes Sedai is beyond silly.

I'm not in the mood for insults so I am out of this conversation.


Why do you consistently ignore that Nynaeve was shielded and called Moghedien's shield a wall? Why didn't that shield bend for her? Surely, since she's as strong as Moghedien, it should.

If you can't rebut that, have the balls to admit it. It is ridiculous that you continually ignore actual quotes.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 Sidious - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2478 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect darius_sedai - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1163 Views
Uhhh... fionwe1987 - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1310 Views
Yet there are problems with either darius_sedai - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1015 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either Sidious - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1269 Views
Would you consider... Duke - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1118 Views
random thought on Shielding darius_sedai - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1150 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. fionwe1987 - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1244 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this darius_sedai - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1095 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness fionwe1987 - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1011 Views
it's a visualization thing really darius_sedai - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1057 Views
Not the crux of the debate... fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1111 Views
Not really though darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 916 Views
I always explained it as fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1140 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1031 Views
That's precisely my point fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1119 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 961 Views
There's actual evidence: fionwe1987 - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1129 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position darius_sedai - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1294 Views
Whoa.. fionwe1987 - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1212 Views
Not at all darius_sedai - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1176 Views
Wonderful fionwe1987 - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1162 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this darius_sedai - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 977 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this Sidious - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1256 Views
Petty much *NM* darius_sedai - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 547 Views
Hmmm.... Sidious - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1219 Views
Let me clear this up darius_sedai - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1359 Views
Some more quotes fionwe1987 - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1139 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise darius_sedai - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1418 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise fionwe1987 - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1155 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise Sidious - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1334 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise fionwe1987 - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1125 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing darius_sedai - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1036 Views
Oh well then I agree with you Sidious - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1212 Views
thanks darius_sedai - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1401 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... fionwe1987 - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 961 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw darius_sedai - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 984 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? fionwe1987 - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1028 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me darius_sedai - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 983 Views
Simple fionwe1987 - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1100 Views
Not at all darius_sedai - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 866 Views
Huh? fionwe1987 - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1106 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* darius_sedai - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 581 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 541 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 987 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1000 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1100 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1058 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1009 Views
Uhhh... fionwe1987 - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1151 Views
Funny, I just saw this post darius_sedai - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 896 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this fionwe1987 - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 927 Views
No it doesn't darius_sedai - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 845 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? Dunstan - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 790 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... Dunstan - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 990 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes